> On May 24, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:
>
> Those are non-standard and a matter of personal taste. I used those before I
> discovered --fixup and --squash. How many variants should we support?
>
> (I'm not totally against the idea, mind you...)
Let's stick with the standard ve
l.org
Betreff: Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging
Those are non-standard and a matter of personal taste. I used those before I
discovered --fixup and --squash. How many variants should we support?
(I'm not totally against the idea, mind you...)
Chee
che Nachricht-
>Von: openssl-project Im Auftrag
>von Richard Levitte
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2018 18:02
>An: openssl-project@openssl.org
>Betreff: Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging
>
>In message <6d5b206f-a0f1-8b60-fbf5-5f08c7c26...@openssl.org>
---
Von: openssl-project Im Auftrag von
Richard Levitte
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2018 18:02
An: openssl-project@openssl.org
Betreff: Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging
In message <6d5b206f-a0f1-8b60-fbf5-5f08c7c26...@openssl.org> on Wed, 23 May
2018 16:54:23 +0100, Matt Cas
In message <20180523.180148.154491224151456127.levi...@openssl.org> on Wed, 23
May 2018 18:01:48 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte said:
levitte> In message <6d5b206f-a0f1-8b60-fbf5-5f08c7c26...@openssl.org> on Wed,
23 May 2018 16:54:23 +0100, Matt Caswell said:
levitte>
levitte> matt> On 23/05/1
In message <6d5b206f-a0f1-8b60-fbf5-5f08c7c26...@openssl.org> on Wed, 23 May
2018 16:54:23 +0100, Matt Caswell said:
matt> On 23/05/18 16:50, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
matt> > But I am curious if we currently do and/or should have a commit hook
matt> > on git.openssl.org to reject commits that start
On 23/05/18 16:50, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:12:30PM +, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
>>> So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious.
>>
>> At the beginnning, I tried to use ghmerge but it was not flexible
>> enough for my needs. In particu
> But I am curious if we currently do and/or should have a commit hook on
> git.openssl.org to reject commits that start with "!fixup".
We probably don't, but it's a good idea to have it.
Matthias
___
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project@opens
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:12:30PM +, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
> > So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious.
>
> At the beginnning, I tried to use ghmerge but it was not flexible
> enough for my needs. In particular, it only gives me the choice
> between squa
> +1 for python! :)
Well, if this is a "go for it"... ;-)
Oh, and I forgot to mention 'ghtool cherry-pick {110,102}'
___
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project@openssl.org
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
>Unfortunately, I didn't have time to follow my vision yet. Also, it would
> have been easier for me to do it in Python than in Perl.
+1 for python! :)
___
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project@openssl.org
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/l
My vision is a more versatile tool (say: ghtool) with separate subcommands as
building blocks to simplify common subtasks:
ghtool {checkout,rebase,squash,addrev,push} ...
This tool could support the concept of a "current pull request" by using a
naming convention for the local branches: 'g
> So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious.
At the beginnning, I tried to use ghmerge but it was not flexible enough for my
needs. In particular, it only gives me the choice between squashing everything
or leaving everything as it is. Most notably, it does not suppor
On 23/05/18 01:43, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > I do the same, but I am reluctant having a script doing it for me using
> some fixed recipe...
>
>>I'm happy doing the build/test manually before merging, too.
>
>
> So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious.
In message <25feb2a8-b363-443d-bae8-c47d1ad92...@akamai.com> on Wed, 23 May
2018 00:43:58 +, "Salz, Rich" said:
rsalz> > I do the same, but I am reluctant having a script doing it for me
using some fixed recipe...
rsalz>
rsalz> >I'm happy doing the build/test manually before me
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:43:58AM +, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > I do the same, but I am reluctant having a script doing it for me using
> some fixed recipe...
>
> >I'm happy doing the build/test manually before merging, too.
>
>
> So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own proce
> On May 22, 2018, at 8:43 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious.
Good point, I've not yet had a chance to look at ghmerge and figure
out how/whether to use it. If that continues, ... my preferences for
its implementation don't carry m
> I do the same, but I am reluctant having a script doing it for me using
some fixed recipe...
>I'm happy doing the build/test manually before merging, too.
So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious.
___
open
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:39:21PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
> > On May 22, 2018, at 8:37 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> >
> > No, I'm sure it does not. I think the safer thing is to do a full build,
> > to catch things like make update errors, and such. I also run the test
> > suite befor
> On May 22, 2018, at 8:37 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> No, I'm sure it does not. I think the safer thing is to do a full build, to
> catch things like make update errors, and such. I also run the test suite
> before I submit.
I do the same, but I am reluctant having a script doing it for me
>It probably does not know how/where I prefer to do builds...
No, I'm sure it does not. I think the safer thing is to do a full build, to
catch things like make update errors, and such. I also run the test suite
before I submit. YMMV.
___
o
> On May 21, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> The ghmerge script has a commented-out call to “opensslbuild” to build+test
> before submitting.
> I would like to enable that, and add either –build or –nobuild flags.
> Thoughts?
It probably does not know how/where I prefer to do builds
The ghmerge script has a commented-out call to “opensslbuild” to build+test
before submitting.
I would like to enable that, and add either –build or –nobuild flags. Thoughts?
___
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project@openssl.org
https://mta.opens
23 matches
Mail list logo
