I have closed the vote now.
The vote was accepted, although with a very narrow margin.
accepted: yes (for: 3, against: 2, abstained: 5, not voted: 1)
Tomas
On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 14:02 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:02:29PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch
> As the change is borderline on bug fix/behaviour change OTC needs
> to decide whether it is acceptable fo
Cancel that, wrong vote.
For this, 0
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:09:12 +0200,
Richard Levitte wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, 09 Oct 2020 14:02:29 +0200,
> Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >
> > topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> > UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.
+1
On Fri, 09 Oct 2020 14:02:29 +0200,
Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch
> As the change is borderline on bug fix/behaviour change OTC needs
> to decide whether it is acceptable f
0
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:02 PM Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch
> As the change is borderline on bug fix/behaviour change OTC needs
> to decide whether it is acceptable for 1.1
-1
I don't see this as a bug fix.
Tim
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 10:02 PM Tomas Mraz wrote:
> topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch
> As the change is borderline on bug fix/behaviour change OTC needs
> to
On 11/10/2020 11:34, Nicola Tuveri wrote:
> I am basing my vote on the feedback provided by @DDvO [0] and @t8m [1].
> In particular I am convinced to vote in favor, as I can see this as a
> bug fix, fixing an undocumented inconsistency, and that it is very
> unlikely it would affect existing app
-1
On 09/10/2020 13:02, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch
> As the change is borderline on bug fix/behaviour change OTC needs
> to decide whether it is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch.
>
+1
I am basing my vote on the feedback provided by @DDvO [0] and @t8m [1].
In particular I am convinced to vote in favor, as I can see this as a
bug fix, fixing an undocumented inconsistency, and that it is very
unlikely it would affect existing applications.
Nicola
[0]: https://github.com/ope
0
> On 9 Oct 2020, at 10:02 pm, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch
> As the change is borderline on bug fix/behaviour change OTC needs
> to decide whether it is acceptable for 1.1.
0
> -Original Message-
> From: openssl-project On Behalf Of
> Tomas Mraz
> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 2:02 PM
> To: openssl-project@openssl.org
> Subject: OTC VOTE: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is a
+1
Pauli
--
Dr Paul Dale | Distinguished Architect | Cryptographic Foundations
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
> On 9 Oct 2020, at 10:02 pm, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
> UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.
topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on
UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch
As the change is borderline on bug fix/behaviour change OTC needs
to decide whether it is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch.
Proposed by Tomas Mraz
Public: yes
opened: 2020-10-0
13 matches
Mail list logo