RE: OTC vote: include Keccak digests in OpenSSL

2021-09-21 Thread Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
+1

Note: please use the vote topic (as stated in votes.txt) as the mail subject 
line to avoid confusion for late voters

> -Original Message-
> From: openssl-project  On Behalf Of Dr 
> Paul Dale
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 11:15 AM
> To: openssl-project@openssl.org
> Subject: OTC vote: include Keccak digests in OpenSSL
> 
> Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
> 
> 
> 
> This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use and
> we have the implementation.  It just isn't exposed.
> 
>    Dmitry [+1]
>    Matt   [ 0]
>    Pauli  [+1]
>    Tim    [+0]
>    Richard    [+1]
>    Shane  [+1]
>    Tomas  [+1]
>    Kurt   [  ]
>    Matthias   [  ]
>    Nicola [+0]
> 
> 
> The vote passed.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: OTC vote: include Keccak digests in OpenSSL

2021-09-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 06:37:42PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 18:32 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 07:14:51PM +1000, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> > > Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use
> > > and we
> > > have the implementation.  It just isn't exposed.
> > 
> > Can you describe where it is in use?
> > 
> 
> Citation from the issue #13033 linked from the PR:
> 
> "Ethereum and after it many cryptographic applications use the original
> pre-NIST variant of SHA3-256, these days named keccak256, where the
> delimiter byte is 0x1 rather than 0x6."

+1


Kurt



Re: OTC vote: include Keccak digests in OpenSSL

2021-09-21 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 18:32 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 07:14:51PM +1000, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> > Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use
> > and we
> > have the implementation.  It just isn't exposed.
> 
> Can you describe where it is in use?
> 

Citation from the issue #13033 linked from the PR:

"Ethereum and after it many cryptographic applications use the original
pre-NIST variant of SHA3-256, these days named keccak256, where the
delimiter byte is 0x1 rather than 0x6."

-- 
Tomáš Mráz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
  Turkish proverb
[You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your
conscience.]




Re: OTC vote: include Keccak digests in OpenSSL

2021-09-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 07:14:51PM +1000, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
> 
> 
> 
> This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use and we
> have the implementation.  It just isn't exposed.

Can you describe where it is in use?


Kurt



OTC vote: include Keccak digests in OpenSSL

2021-09-21 Thread Dr Paul Dale

Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process



This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use and 
we have the implementation.  It just isn't exposed.


  Dmitry [+1]
  Matt   [ 0]
  Pauli  [+1]
  Tim    [+0]
  Richard    [+1]
  Shane  [+1]
  Tomas  [+1]
  Kurt   [  ]
  Matthias   [  ]
  Nicola [+0]


The vote passed.