Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Matt Caswell
On 29/03/18 11:06, Matt Caswell wrote: > "Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed > during the beta as long as at least 3 OMC members approve the change" I started a vote with this text, and will report back here when I have the results. Matt

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message <4e32b364-3ed3-9101-158c-09338f96e...@openssl.org> on Thu, 29 Mar > 2018 11:06:46 +0100, Matt Caswell said: > > matt> How about this for the vote text: > matt> > matt> "Feature changes in 1.1.1

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Salz, Rich
>"Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed during the beta as long as at least 3 OMC members approve the change" Fine. Please run the vote soon as there is not much time. ___ openssl-project mailing list

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <4e32b364-3ed3-9101-158c-09338f96e...@openssl.org> on Thu, 29 Mar 2018 11:06:46 +0100, Matt Caswell said: matt> How about this for the vote text: matt> matt> "Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed matt> during the beta as long as at

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-27 Thread Matt Caswell
On 27/03/18 14:00, Salz, Rich wrote: > Discussion seems to have stalled out on this.  Please review > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5702 if necessary. > >   > > Do folks want a general “TLS 1.3 is okay post-freeze” policy? I think that is ok and doesn't stray too far from what we

[openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-27 Thread Salz, Rich
Discussion seems to have stalled out on this. Please review https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5702 if necessary. Do folks want a general “TLS 1.3 is okay post-freeze” policy? I don’t know, but I think it will take too long to get to a decision. Is anyone (on the OMC) going to take that