Re: [openssl-project] GitHub labels

2018-06-22 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20180622010813.gy4...@kduck.kaduk.org> on Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:08:13 -0500, Benjamin Kaduk said: kaduk> What's still unclear to me in the current scheme is how I'm supposed to kaduk> indicate something that is (intentionally) API/ABI-breaking and must be kaduk> postponed to the next

Re: [openssl-project] GitHub labels

2018-06-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:29:37PM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message on Wed, 20 Jun > 2018 19:59:02 +, "Dr. Matthias St. Pierre" > said: > > Matthias.St.Pierre> III) VERSION NUMBER LABELS > Matthias.St.Pierre> > Matthias.St.Pierre> It seems like the version number labels

Re: [openssl-project] GitHub labels

2018-06-20 Thread Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
> Matthias.St.Pierre> The github search index allows to search for > 'base:' which is a much Matthias.St.Pierre> more reliable way of > determining the target branch: > > I'm learning something new, I had no clue of the 'base:' feature. Me neither, until today ;-). I looked it up on a useful

Re: [openssl-project] GitHub labels

2018-06-20 Thread Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
> Matthias.St.Pierre> A propos: it might be useful to split the 'pending > Matthias.St.Pierre> 2nd review' into two different labels (of the same color): > Matthias.St.Pierre> > Matthias.St.Pierre> 'pending 2nd review'  ->  'review-required'  > and > 'omc-review-required' > > I'm

Re: [openssl-project] GitHub labels

2018-06-20 Thread Richard Levitte
In message on Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:59:02 +, "Dr. Matthias St. Pierre" said: Matthias.St.Pierre> There are a lot of things that come to my mind when I see all those labels: Matthias.St.Pierre> Matthias.St.Pierre> IMHO there are too many of them and for some of them the precise meaning is

Re: [openssl-project] GitHub labels

2018-06-20 Thread Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
There are a lot of things that come to my mind when I see all those labels: IMHO there are too many of them and for some of them the precise meaning is not clear. So maybe we should reduce their number a bit and document the meaning and semantics of the other. I) NAMING CONVENTIONS First of

[openssl-project] GitHub labels

2018-06-20 Thread Salz, Rich
I think it’s a good idea that we periodically review the labels we’re using. Please look at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/labels and maybe suggest changes. ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org