On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 04:32:42PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 28, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > So should I send that mail?
>
> I made some editorial changes to the Wiki section on SNI.
> No strong views on sending the mail...
So I've sent it.
In message <431270c5-3da3-4a9d-9292-12adc46cc...@dukhovni.org> on Sat, 21 Apr
2018 14:45:34 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni said:
openssl-users> > We are considering if we should enable TLS 1.3 by default or
not,
openssl-users> > or when it should be enabled. For that, we
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 07:16:04PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> * Something else?
We could call for testing what really happens on -users? I could
also send one to debian-devel-announce, we already have pre4 in
experimental.
Maybe we can convert the blog post into a wiki, update it to
In message on Thu, 19 Apr
2018 19:16:04 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni said:
openssl-users> But not all the friction can be eliminated, and likely not
openssl-users> all providers can be persuaded to be more accommodating.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 07:16:04PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> But not all the friction can be eliminated, and likely not
> all providers can be persuaded to be more accommodating.
> Which leaves us with some difficult judgement calls:
>
> * Restrict TLS 1.3 support to just applications
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 1:48 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>> I might suggest conditioning it on the compile-time version of OpenSSL
>> headers. This is a common transition strategy for systems working
>> through ABI constraints. (In some systems, this is implemented as some
>>