> appro> How about this. We have touched this when discussing windows-makefile.
> I
> appro> mean when I called it VC-specific, you disagreed, and I said that
> appro> embedding manifest effectively makes it VC-specific. In the context I
> appro> also suggested post-link stage, a command one could
In message <072aaeb6-59b9-0e8a-f33e-35572350c...@openssl.org> on Mon, 26 Mar
2018 14:15:24 +0200, Andy Polyakov said:
appro> > So no, a straight makefile rule for a config attribute value isn't
appro> > going to be good enough.
appro>
appro> How about this. We have touched this when discussing
> appro> > Another side thing that I've been thinking of for quite a while, and
> I
> appro> > think you may have argued for even though I feel a bit unsure, and
> appro> > that's to support command line attributes as an alternative to that
> appro> > increasing amount of specialised attributes, s
Branching a specific thread around these ideas.
In message on Sun, 25 Mar
2018 18:45:40 +0200, Andy Polyakov said:
appro> > Another side thing that I've been thinking of for quite a while, and I
appro> > think you may have argued for even though I feel a bit unsure, and
appro> > that's to supp
