Re: HPKE PR process question
On 23/05/2022 22:41, Stephen Farrell wrote: Hi, Back in November 2021 (~6 months ago) I created a PR [1] suggesting an implementation of RFC 9180. In discussion, the "need OMC decision" tag was added to the PR on Dec 14th. Since then, I have heard nothing at all and so far as I can see, from bits of the openssl-project list archive that I've checked, the OMC has had no discussion of this PR at all. Sorry that it has taken so long to get to this point. I assure you that the OMC have been discussing this PR and have now voted to lift the hold on it (which I have now done). Matt So, now I'm wondering how to make process-progress with this PR - can you assist or point me at the correct place to ask? (I can start a thread on openssl-users I guess if that's better?) Please note that this is about trying to unblock the process - the details of HPKE APIs are separate. (I remain happy to do work to get my code in a shape that the project likes, but to be honest, 6 months of seeming process-blockage with no feedback is a tad de-motivating.) Thanks, Stephen. [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17172
Re: HPKE PR process question
Hiya, On 25/05/2022 12:23, Matt Caswell wrote: Acknowledging receipt of this. We'll get back to you on it. Thanks. I'm happy to provide further info or be involved in the discussion if that's useful. An ETA for a substantive response would also be welcome (e.g. weeks, a month, ...) Cheers, S Matt On 23/05/2022 22:41, Stephen Farrell wrote: Hi, Back in November 2021 (~6 months ago) I created a PR [1] suggesting an implementation of RFC 9180. In discussion, the "need OMC decision" tag was added to the PR on Dec 14th. Since then, I have heard nothing at all and so far as I can see, from bits of the openssl-project list archive that I've checked, the OMC has had no discussion of this PR at all. So, now I'm wondering how to make process-progress with this PR - can you assist or point me at the correct place to ask? (I can start a thread on openssl-users I guess if that's better?) Please note that this is about trying to unblock the process - the details of HPKE APIs are separate. (I remain happy to do work to get my code in a shape that the project likes, but to be honest, 6 months of seeming process-blockage with no feedback is a tad de-motivating.) Thanks, Stephen. [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17172 OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: HPKE PR process question
Acknowledging receipt of this. We'll get back to you on it. Matt On 23/05/2022 22:41, Stephen Farrell wrote: Hi, Back in November 2021 (~6 months ago) I created a PR [1] suggesting an implementation of RFC 9180. In discussion, the "need OMC decision" tag was added to the PR on Dec 14th. Since then, I have heard nothing at all and so far as I can see, from bits of the openssl-project list archive that I've checked, the OMC has had no discussion of this PR at all. So, now I'm wondering how to make process-progress with this PR - can you assist or point me at the correct place to ask? (I can start a thread on openssl-users I guess if that's better?) Please note that this is about trying to unblock the process - the details of HPKE APIs are separate. (I remain happy to do work to get my code in a shape that the project likes, but to be honest, 6 months of seeming process-blockage with no feedback is a tad de-motivating.) Thanks, Stephen. [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17172
HPKE PR process question
Hi, Back in November 2021 (~6 months ago) I created a PR [1] suggesting an implementation of RFC 9180. In discussion, the "need OMC decision" tag was added to the PR on Dec 14th. Since then, I have heard nothing at all and so far as I can see, from bits of the openssl-project list archive that I've checked, the OMC has had no discussion of this PR at all. So, now I'm wondering how to make process-progress with this PR - can you assist or point me at the correct place to ask? (I can start a thread on openssl-users I guess if that's better?) Please note that this is about trying to unblock the process - the details of HPKE APIs are separate. (I remain happy to do work to get my code in a shape that the project likes, but to be honest, 6 months of seeming process-blockage with no feedback is a tad de-motivating.) Thanks, Stephen. [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17172 OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
