Re: OTC VOTE: EVP init functions and the provider interface

2021-03-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:25:50AM +, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: EVP init functions take an OSSL_PARAM array to set parameters and > this >should be reflected in the equivalent provider interface. +1 Kurt

Re: OTC VOTE: EVP init functions and the provider interface

2021-03-09 Thread Matt Caswell
This is related to the discussion in PR #14383. It has already been decided to add OSSL_PARAM arrays as an argument to the various EVP "init" functions. During the implementation of that there were differing views about whether this same change should be reflected in the core<->provider

Re: OTC VOTE: EVP init functions and the provider interface

2021-03-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:25:50AM +, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: EVP init functions take an OSSL_PARAM array to set parameters and > this >should be reflected in the equivalent provider interface. I need more information than the vote text to be able to vote on this. Kurt

OTC VOTE: EVP init functions and the provider interface

2021-03-09 Thread Matt Caswell
topic: EVP init functions take an OSSL_PARAM array to set parameters and this should be reflected in the equivalent provider interface. Proposed by Matt Caswell Public: yes opened: 2021-03-09 closed: 2021-03-09 accepted: yes (for: 5, against: 0, abstained: 2, not voted: 4) Matt