This vote is now closed.
accepted: yes (for: 8, against: 0, abstained: 0, not voted: 3)
Tomas
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 13:45 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Vote background
> ---
>
> The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required
> public
> component for EVP_PKEY has
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:45:07PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> topic: For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys all algorithm implementations that were usable
>with 1.1.1 EVP_PKEY API or low level APIs without public component must
>stay usable.
>
>This overrules the
> * all
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: openssl-project On Behalf Of Matt
> Caswell
> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 10:46 AM
> To: openssl-project@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: OTC VOTE: Keeping API compatibility with missing public key
>
> +1
>
> On 04/12/2020 12:
+1
On 04/12/2020 12:45, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Vote background
> ---
>
> The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
> component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text:
>
> For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following resolution:
> * relax
+1
On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:45:07 +0100,
Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> Vote background
> ---
>
> The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
> component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text:
>
> For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following
+1
> On 4 Dec 2020, at 10:45 pm, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> Vote background
> ---
>
> The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
> component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text:
>
> For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following
+1
Note I support also changing all key types to be able to operate without
the public component (where that is possible) which goes beyond what this
vote covers (as previously noted).
Having a documented conceptual model that is at odds with the code isn't a
good thing and in particular this
+1
Pauli
--
Dr Paul Dale | Distinguished Architect | Cryptographic Foundations
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
> On 4 Dec 2020, at 10:45 pm, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> Vote background
> ---
>
> The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
>
Vote background
---
The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text:
For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following resolution:
* relax the conceptual model to allow private keys to exist without
