l.org
> Subject: OTC vote: include Keccak digests in OpenSSL
>
> Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
>
>
>
> This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use and
> we have the implementation. It just isn't exp
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 06:37:42PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 18:32 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 07:14:51PM +1000, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> > > Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This doesn't meet
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 18:32 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 07:14:51PM +1000, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> > Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
> >
> >
> >
> > This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use
> > and we
> > have the
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 07:14:51PM +1000, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
>
>
>
> This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use and we
> have the implementation. It just isn't exposed.
Can you describe where it is in
Accept PR#16594 into master subject to the normal review process
This doesn't meet the "is a standard" requirement but it is in use and
we have the implementation. It just isn't exposed.
Dmitry [+1]
Matt [ 0]
Pauli [+1]
Tim [+0]
Richard [+1]
Shane
