On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 10:18 +, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2020 08:15, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > The current implementation in the PR - unconditionally returning
> > error
> > - is completely useless. It would make some (not much) sense if we
> > aimed for ABI compatibility with 3.0 however
On 04/03/2020 08:15, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> The current implementation in the PR - unconditionally returning error
> - is completely useless. It would make some (not much) sense if we
> aimed for ABI compatibility with 3.0 however that is definitely not the
> case so the only reasonable thing is
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 13:47 +1000, SHANE LONTIS wrote:
> FIPS_mode() and FIPS_mode_set() are functions that were used by the
> old FOM.
>
> In OpenSSL_111 they were stripped down to do almost nothing
> i.e:-
>
> int FIPS_mode(void)
> {
> /* This version of the library does not
FIPS_mode() and FIPS_mode_set() are functions that were used by the old FOM.
In OpenSSL_111 they were stripped down to do almost nothing
i.e:-
int FIPS_mode(void)
{
/* This version of the library does not support FIPS mode. */
return 0;
}
int FIPS_mode_set(int
