On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:24:59 +0200,
Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> 1 PR which is in a state of "we really need to do something about this":
> [WIP, Parked] EVP: Adapt EVP_PKEY_set_alias_type() for provider-native
> EVP_PKEYs
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12675
> Since this affects a public AP
On 18/09/2020 16:59, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 16:24 +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
>>
>> 1 PR which is in a state of "its unclear what we do with this":
>> [WIP] Rename some XXX_ex() related methods to XXX_with_libctx()
>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12701
>> With no agr
On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 16:24 +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> 1 PR which is in a state of "its unclear what we do with this":
> [WIP] Rename some XXX_ex() related methods to XXX_with_libctx()
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12701
> With no agreement on a naming convention its unclear if thi
As of right now we have 13 PRs with the beta1 milestone against them.
Of these there are 4 which really need our focused attention. These are
2 PRs which are in a state of "written but still in review":
WIP: Implement Provider side SM2 Asymmetric Cipher support
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/
