Re: Tracking important issues

2020-10-05 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 10:00 +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > > On 04/10/2020 15:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to have a system so that we can tag issues as > > > important. But I think they fall in a few

Re: Tracking important issues

2020-10-05 Thread Matt Caswell
On 04/10/2020 15:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to have a system so that we can tag issues as >> important. But I think they fall in a few categories: >> - Features for the next minor/major release (so 3.1 or 4.0)

Re: Tracking important issues

2020-10-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to have a system so that we can tag issues as > important. But I think they fall in a few categories: > - Features for the next minor/major release (so 3.1 or 4.0) > that we find important. I've created a new

Tracking important issues

2020-09-23 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, I would like to have a system so that we can tag issues as important. But I think they fall in a few categories: - Features for the next minor/major release (so 3.1 or 4.0) that we find important. I've created a new milestone for that: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/milestone/18 (Post