On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 07:00:21PM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote:
> kurt> I wonder if it's useful to have a thread of VMS that collects
> kurt> such bits all the time, like the kernel is doing.
>
> I was pondering something like that, and it does make sense. That, or
> creating a generic device
Hi,
I'd like to hear *more* opinions in light of recent comments to
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4793. (Strangely enough I get
"This page is taking way too long to load" if attempt to access it when
I'm logged on[!?]. But I have no problems opening requests from the
middle, long
We have been getting asked about the status of the OpenSSL FIPS 2.0
Validation, Certificate 1747 [1]. In particular, they read the notice
about "symmetric key wrapping"[2] and wondered if OpenSSL would
be moved to the Historical list.
The OpenSSL validation testing was performed by InfoGard
This email starts a vote. Two notes:
The contents of the PR are also attached.
I have BCC’d openssl-project, for public notification about the
vote. I’m not sure if this is the best way to do things, but it’s worth a shot.
Incorporate the text topic: Incorporate
Hi,
I would like to talk with some one about my company possibly sponsoring
OpenSSL to get 1.1 or newer enabled with FIPS support. I know there have
been some other sponsorships and setbacks from sponsors leaving. I'd like
to understand the roadmap for FIPS and what support you need to be able to
This is an old message that had been held up in the moderator queue. Ignore it.
From: Rich Salz
Reply-To: "openssl-project@openssl.org"
Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 10:02 PM
To: "openssl-...@openssl.org"
Subject:
This vote failed. It was two in favor, two opposed, three no-care, and one not
voting.
I hope someone else will pick this up and run with it. I am closing the PR.
topic: Incorporate the text of https://github.com/openssl/web/pull/43
into the coding style policy.