On Thu, 23 May 2019 16:25:07 +0200,
Salz, Rich wrote:
> I understand that OpenSSL is changing things so that, by mechanism (and maybe
> by policy although
> it’s not published yet), two members of the same company cannot approve the
> same PR. That’s
> great. (I never approved Akamai requests
> I understand that OpenSSL is changing things so that, by mechanism (and
maybe by
> policy although it’s not published yet), two members of the same company
cannot
> approve the same PR. That’s great. (I never approved Akamai requests
unless it
> was trivial back when I was
On 23/05/2019 16:01, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > I understand that OpenSSL is changing things so that, by mechanism (and
> maybe by
> > policy although it’s not published yet), two members of the same
> company cannot
> > approve the same PR. That’s great. (I never approved Akamai
On 23/05/2019 15:25, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I understand that OpenSSL is changing things so that, by mechanism (and maybe
> by
> policy although it’s not published yet), two members of the same company
> cannot
> approve the same PR. That’s great. (I never approved Akamai requests unless
> it
On 23/05/2019 16:54, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> In that example the potential conflict of interest comes from the
>> individual's
> employment with the third party organisation, not because they are fellows.
>
> Do you disagree with my contention that the OMC represents the project, and
> not the
On 23/05/2019 18:14, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 17:17 +0200, Richard Levitte wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 May 2019 16:25:07 +0200,
>> Salz, Rich wrote:
>>> I understand that OpenSSL is changing things so that, by mechanism
>>> (and maybe by policy although
>>> it’s not published yet),
On 23/05/2019 18:25, Matt Caswell wrote:
> Please see the following blog post by Matthias about the recent committers
> day:
>
> https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2019/05/23/f2f-committers-day/
I should point out BTW that eating vegemite is not a requirement for becoming a
committer. :-)
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 03:45:48PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> IMO, no.
I also don't see a need for this at present, and it is not clear
that there are enough active part-time reviewers in place to keep
up with commits from the fellows in a timely manner.
--
Viktor.
> In private email, and
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8886#issuecomment-494624313 the
implication is that this was a policy.
AFAIK this is not the case.
Is the comment wrong, either factually or because it is implementing something
that isn't an official policy?
>
On Thu, 23 May 2019 19:26:59 +0200,
Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> On 23/05/2019 18:25, Matt Caswell wrote:
> > Please see the following blog post by Matthias about the recent committers
> > day:
> >
> > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2019/05/23/f2f-committers-day/
>
> I should point out BTW that
On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 17:17 +0200, Richard Levitte wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 16:25:07 +0200,
> Salz, Rich wrote:
> > I understand that OpenSSL is changing things so that, by mechanism
> > (and maybe by policy although
> > it’s not published yet), two members of the same company cannot
> >
On 23/05/2019 16:31, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > In private email, and
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8886#issuecomment-494624313 the
> implication is that this was a policy.
>
> AFAIK this is not the case.
>
> Is the comment wrong, either factually or because it is
> No such decision has been made as far as I know although it has been discussed
> at various times.
>
> > Should this policy be extended to OpenSSL’s fellows?
>
> IMO, no.
I agree with Matt: While this policy makes sense for employers of third party
companies,
because these companies might
There hasn't been a vote about this, however both Shane and I have committed to
not approve each other's PRs.
I also asked Richard if this could be mechanically enforced, which I expect
will happen eventually.
Pauli
--
Oracle
Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption
We have discussed this at numerous OMC meetings in terms of how to managed
potential *perceived *conflicts of interest that might arise if people
outside of the fellows come from the same company and hence can effectively
turn the OMC review control mechanism into a single control rather than a
15 matches
Mail list logo
