OTC vote on accepting #16171: config_diagnostic

Accept PR 16171 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process. Pauli

OTC vote on accepting #16203: TLS 1.3 KDF

Accept PR 16203 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process. This one is still undergoing early review. Pauli

Re: OTC quick votes [WAS: RE: OTC vote PR #16171: config_diagnostic]

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:26 AM Dr. Matthias St. Pierre < matthias.st.pie...@ncp-e.com> wrote: > > I'm starting to vote -1 on anything has a vote text that looks like > that, so -1. > > I perfectly understand Kurt's dislike of this kind of votes. The text is > not very informative for OTC members

Re: OTC quick votes [WAS: RE: OTC vote PR #16171: config_diagnostic]

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:21:57AM +1000, Tim Hudson wrote: > > This isn't about the OTC meeting itself - this is about the details of the > topic actually being captured within the PR. > You need to actually look at the PR to form a view. And we do add to the > PRs during the discussion if

Re: OTC vote on accepting #16171: config_diagnostic

This vote has now passed: topic: Accept PR 16171 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process. Proposed by Pauli. Public: yes opened: 2021-08-03 closed: 2021-08-04 accepted:  yes  (for: 6, against: 1, abstained:1, not voted: 2) ONE WEEK VOTE   Dmitry [+1]   Matt  

Re: OTC quick votes [WAS: RE: OTC vote PR #16171: config_diagnostic]

The votes on the PR are precisely that - to vote to proceed with the PR via the normal review process - and that means looking at the varying viewpoints. If we reached a consensus that overall we didn't think the PR made sense then we wouldn't form a vote of that form. What you are voting for is

OTC quick votes [WAS: RE: OTC vote PR #16171: config_diagnostic]

> I'm starting to vote -1 on anything has a vote text that looks like that, so > -1. I perfectly understand Kurt's dislike of this kind of votes. The text is not very informative for OTC members who weren't able to participate at the weekly video meetings. IMHO it proves that the current

RE: OTC vote on accepting #16171: config_diagnostic

0 From: openssl-project On Behalf Of Dr Paul Dale Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 11:03 AM To: openssl-project@openssl.org Subject: OTC vote on accepting #16171: config_diagnostic Accept PR 16171 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process. Pauli

RE: OTC vote on accepting #16203: TLS 1.3 KDF

0 From: openssl-project On Behalf Of Dr Paul Dale Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 11:03 AM To: openssl-project@openssl.org Subject: OTC vote on accepting #16203: TLS 1.3 KDF Accept PR 16203 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process. This one is

RE: OTC quick votes [WAS: RE: OTC vote PR #16171: config_diagnostic]

You probably all noticed my mistake: I meant to say 'quorum', not 'quota'. Matthias > -Original Message- > From: openssl-project On Behalf Of Dr. > Matthias St. Pierre > Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 9:26 PM > To: Kurt Roeckx ; Dr Paul Dale > Cc: openssl-project@openssl.org > Subject: