On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
-1
Do we need some general policy for such changes after the 3.0
release?
Kurt
I currently fail to see why you can't describe in words what you
intend to fix. The PR itself has a subject, so have the commits.
One of the reasons we have this vote is public is so that people
reading this list can comment on it. Just some number doesn't tell
them anything without having to go
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:36 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> > topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
>
> -1
>
> Do we need some general policy for such changes after the 3.0
> release?
>
>
I think we need some
You cannot meaningfully vote on the PR without reviewing it. It is that
simple. There is zero point in providing details beyond that as the PR is
the details. The subject of the PR doesn't remove the need to read the
details to form a view.
The commentary on the PR and the code itself is what
