OpenSSL 3.0 LTS

2022-03-04 Thread Matt Caswell
OpenSSL 3.0 has recently been designated as a Long Term Support (LTS) release. This means that it will now be supported until 7th September 2026 (5 years after its initial release). Our previous LTS release (1.1.1) will continue to be supported until 11th September 2023. We encourage all

OMC VOTE: The next LTS release

2022-02-16 Thread Matt Caswell
The OMC vote for the following proposal has now started: "We should announce that the next LTS release will be 3.0" OMC members please cast your votes here: https://github.com/openssl/general-policies/issues/9 Matt

Re: [OMC VOTE PROPOSAL] macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS

2020-11-30 Thread Matt Caswell
On 27/11/2020 17:24, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 27/11/2020 17:15, Matt Caswell wrote: >> >> >> On 25/11/2020 20:17, Felix Bünemann wrote: >>> Regarding inclusion of macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS: >>> >>> The OMC accepts

Re: [OMC VOTE PROPOSAL] macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS

2020-11-27 Thread Matt Caswell
On 27/11/2020 17:15, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 25/11/2020 20:17, Felix Bünemann wrote: >> Regarding inclusion of macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS: >> >> The OMC accepts the required configuration change, making an exception to the >> LTS rule t

Re: [OMC VOTE PROPOSAL] macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS

2020-11-27 Thread Matt Caswell
On 25/11/2020 20:17, Felix Bünemann wrote: > Regarding inclusion of macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS: > > The OMC accepts the required configuration change, making an exception to the > LTS rule that prevents adding new platforms. I'm about to raise this vote, but I p

Re: [OMC VOTE PROPOSAL] macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS

2020-11-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
de changes to support a new > >> platform. > > > > In a previous discussion we have talked about when a platform can > > be added in an LTS release. I think that in general if it's only > > configuration changes and there is a very low risk that it's going > > to

Re: [OMC VOTE PROPOSAL] macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS

2020-11-27 Thread Felix Bünemann
ut when a platform can > be added in an LTS release. I think that in general if it's only > configuration changes and there is a very low risk that it's going > to have issues requiring other changes, we should allow it. Do you have a link to that discussion? If there is a prior example wh

Re: [OMC VOTE PROPOSAL] macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS

2020-11-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Felix Bünemann wrote: > > It is also unique cause it requires no code changes to support a new platform. In a previous discussion we have talked about when a platform can be added in an LTS release. I think that in general if it's only configu

[OMC VOTE PROPOSAL] macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS

2020-11-25 Thread Felix Bünemann
/ee30b5c8f52e030629dc2de95f81d8b1 -- OMC VOTE: macOS ARM64 Support in OpenSSL 1.1.1 LTS Background to the vote: Apple has recently released new Mac computers that are powered by their own ARMv8 compatible SoC called the Apple Silicon M1 or short M1. This chip is an evolution

Re: LTS+

2020-10-19 Thread Dr Paul Dale
, 18:29, Matt Caswell > <mailto:m...@openssl.org>> napsal/a: >>> >>> >>> On 19/10/2020 15:14, Matt Caswell wrote: >>>> LTS+ releases may contain the following new features: >>>> - Support for additional platforms >>>>

Re: LTS+

2020-10-19 Thread Dr Paul Dale
w entropy source on an existing > platform especially on some that currently don't have adequate ones would be > covered by this. > > ⁣Tomáš​ > > 19. 10. 2020 18:29, 18:29, Matt Caswell napsal/a: >> >> >> On 19/10/2020 15:14, Matt Caswell wrote: >>>

Re: LTS+

2020-10-19 Thread Tomas Mraz
I wonder if something like adding a new entropy source on an existing platform especially on some that currently don't have adequate ones would be covered by this. ⁣Tomáš​ 19. 10. 2020 18:29, 18:29, Matt Caswell napsal/a: > > >On 19/10/2020 15:14, Matt Caswell wrote: >> LT

Re: LTS+

2020-10-19 Thread Matt Caswell
On 19/10/2020 15:14, Matt Caswell wrote: > LTS+ releases may contain the following new features: > - Support for additional platforms > - Performance improvements Based on the discussion in PR #13176, I'd like to add to this list: - Extending existing features to existing platfo

LTS+

2020-10-19 Thread Matt Caswell
At the recent Committer and OTC meetings a proposal was discussed to add further clarity to what is allowed in stable releases, and to introduce a new "LTS+" type of release to go alongside the existing LTS release. The idea is that an LTS release is restricted to bug fixes and secu