Re: OTC VOTE: Disallow SM2 with a non-SM2 curve

2021-03-16 Thread Matt Caswell
This vote has now closed: accepted: yes (for: 7, against: 1, abstained: 1, not voted: 2) Matt On 09/03/2021 10:24, Matt Caswell wrote: topic: In 3.0 it will not be possible to use SM2 with a non-SM2 curve. This    should be documented. Proposed by Matt Caswell Public: yes opened:

Re: OTC VOTE: Disallow SM2 with a non-SM2 curve

2021-03-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:24:32AM +, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: In 3.0 it will not be possible to use SM2 with a non-SM2 curve. This >should be documented. +1 Kurt

Re: OTC VOTE: Disallow SM2 with a non-SM2 curve

2021-03-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:44:22AM +0200, Nicola Tuveri wrote: > Yes, in 1.1.1j the following is possible: > > - SM2 cryptosystem operations over the "SM2 curve" > - SM2 cryptosystem operations over arbitrary curve (including NIST ones) > - ECDSA/ECDH cryptosystem operations over the "SM2 curve"

Re: OTC VOTE: Disallow SM2 with a non-SM2 curve

2021-03-09 Thread Nicola Tuveri
Yes, in 1.1.1j the following is possible: - SM2 cryptosystem operations over the "SM2 curve" - SM2 cryptosystem operations over arbitrary curve (including NIST ones) - ECDSA/ECDH cryptosystem operations over the "SM2 curve" (See attached patches to verify this is the case in the tests) They

Re: OTC VOTE: Disallow SM2 with a non-SM2 curve

2021-03-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 03:57:32PM +0200, Nicola Tuveri wrote: > It is tangent to the vote in itself, but I'd like to highlight that in part > this vote is motivated by getting rid of cases where there is a need to > convert between compatible key types (e.g. SM2 & EC, DH & DHX). > > The vote of

Re: OTC VOTE: Disallow SM2 with a non-SM2 curve

2021-03-09 Thread Nicola Tuveri
It is tangent to the vote in itself, but I'd like to highlight that in part this vote is motivated by getting rid of cases where there is a need to convert between compatible key types (e.g. SM2 & EC, DH & DHX). The vote of this text does not cover it, but another use case that we will likely

Re: OTC VOTE: Disallow SM2 with a non-SM2 curve

2021-03-09 Thread Tomas Mraz
For OTC members - please note that this vote is not closed, so your vote counts if you have not voted yet! :D On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 10:24 +, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: In 3.0 it will not be possible to use SM2 with a non-SM2 > curve. This > should be documented. > Proposed by Matt

OTC VOTE: Disallow SM2 with a non-SM2 curve

2021-03-09 Thread Matt Caswell
topic: In 3.0 it will not be possible to use SM2 with a non-SM2 curve. This should be documented. Proposed by Matt Caswell Public: yes opened: 2021-03-09 closed: 2021-mm-dd accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T) Matt [+1] Mark [ ] Pauli