This vote has now closed:
accepted: yes (for: 7, against: 1, abstained: 1, not voted: 2)
Matt
On 09/03/2021 10:24, Matt Caswell wrote:
topic: In 3.0 it will not be possible to use SM2 with a non-SM2 curve. This
should be documented.
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:24:32AM +, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: In 3.0 it will not be possible to use SM2 with a non-SM2 curve. This
>should be documented.
+1
Kurt
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:44:22AM +0200, Nicola Tuveri wrote:
> Yes, in 1.1.1j the following is possible:
>
> - SM2 cryptosystem operations over the "SM2 curve"
> - SM2 cryptosystem operations over arbitrary curve (including NIST ones)
> - ECDSA/ECDH cryptosystem operations over the "SM2 curve"
Yes, in 1.1.1j the following is possible:
- SM2 cryptosystem operations over the "SM2 curve"
- SM2 cryptosystem operations over arbitrary curve (including NIST ones)
- ECDSA/ECDH cryptosystem operations over the "SM2 curve"
(See attached patches to verify this is the case in the tests)
They
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 03:57:32PM +0200, Nicola Tuveri wrote:
> It is tangent to the vote in itself, but I'd like to highlight that in part
> this vote is motivated by getting rid of cases where there is a need to
> convert between compatible key types (e.g. SM2 & EC, DH & DHX).
>
> The vote of
It is tangent to the vote in itself, but I'd like to highlight that in part
this vote is motivated by getting rid of cases where there is a need to
convert between compatible key types (e.g. SM2 & EC, DH & DHX).
The vote of this text does not cover it, but another use case that we will
likely
For OTC members - please note that this vote is not closed, so your
vote counts if you have not voted yet! :D
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 10:24 +, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: In 3.0 it will not be possible to use SM2 with a non-SM2
> curve. This
> should be documented.
> Proposed by Matt
topic: In 3.0 it will not be possible to use SM2 with a non-SM2 curve. This
should be documented.
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened: 2021-03-09
closed: 2021-mm-dd
accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T)
Matt [+1]
Mark [ ]
Pauli