Re: default cipher suit in open ssl

2004-04-01 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:52:55 -0500, rajesh nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rajeshnairg which is the default cipher suit in open ssl library ? Whatever is output with openssl ciphers rajeshnairg i print all the cipher suits using openssl ciphers , but rajeshnairg i

Re: OPENSSL_NO_KRB5

2004-04-01 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:52:56 -0800, BV [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: openssl Can somebody explain or point me to docs on this flag? openssl openssl I'm not sure why Kerberos 5 would be excluded by default... openssl openssl If I want Kerberos support, should I remove

Re: default cipher suit in open ssl

2004-04-01 Thread rajesh nair
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:52:55 -0500, rajesh nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rajeshnairg which is the default cipher suit in open ssl library ? Whatever is output with openssl ciphers rajeshnairg i print all the cipher suits using openssl ciphers , but

Re: default cipher suit in open ssl

2004-04-01 Thread Richard Koenning
rajesh nair wrote: I saw all the cipher names but i want to know the default cipher suit supported by openssl lib. if i write a program using openssl , with out using SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() function what will bw the default cipher set ? (that is i am not choosing a cipher suit from the list

Re:Programming difficulties

2004-04-01 Thread Carlos Roberto Zainos H
Thanks a lot Dr Stephan, Richard and Bernhard I made revisions to my source, docs and faq's and now this works fine ... Best regards Zainos Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Net: La mejor conexión a internet y 25MB extra a tu correo por $100 al mes.

openssl correcting exponent for keyhash?

2004-04-01 Thread Lutz Feldgen
Hi, I try to figure out openssls handling of keys with negative exponent (to be exact, the exponent of 1024 bit key seems to be missing the first byte.) It also seems that openssl is then automatically adding this null-byte as there are no negative exponents...and my codec is not. Am I right

X509_STORE_load_locations always not return 1

2004-04-01 Thread
In my program,X509_STORE_load_locations(store, CA_FILE, CA_DIR) always not return 1.why?my CA cert is in DER format. what is X509_STORE_load_locations's default CA cert format?PEM?but my CA cert is in DER format.how should I do? _

Re: default cipher suit in open ssl

2004-04-01 Thread Amar Desai
rajesh nair wrote: I saw all the cipher names but i want to know the default cipher suit supported by openssl lib. if i write a program using openssl , with out using SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() function what will bw the default cipher set ? (that is i am not choosing a cipher suit from the

Re: openssl correcting exponent for keyhash?

2004-04-01 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004, Lutz Feldgen wrote: Hi, I try to figure out openssls handling of keys with negative exponent (to be exact, the exponent of 1024 bit key seems to be missing the first byte.) It also seems that openssl is then automatically adding this null-byte as there are no

Re: openssl correcting exponent for keyhash?

2004-04-01 Thread Lutz Feldgen
Hi Dr. Henson, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: On Thu, Apr 01, 2004, Lutz Feldgen wrote: Hi, I try to figure out openssls handling of keys with negative exponent (to be exact, the exponent of 1024 bit key seems to be missing the first byte.) It also seems that openssl is then automatically adding

compile problem in latest snap shot

2004-04-01 Thread Frank
Just grabed the lastest snap shot of openssl Got a compile problem that probably needs to be addressed. In file x509_vfy.h the prototype for X509_policy_check() uses a reserved word explicit int X509_policy_check(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, int *explicit, Thanks,. Frank

Re: compile problem in latest snap shot

2004-04-01 Thread Charles B Cranston
We cannot find explicit as a reserved word in a (fairly old) ANSI C book. Is this the GNU compiler or a vendor compiler? Could this be a vendor-specific extension? Is there a compiler command line switch to remove vendor-specific extensions? Would the GNU compiler work better anyway? Just

Re: compile problem in latest snap shot

2004-04-01 Thread Charles B Cranston
OOPS, sorry, it is a C++ reserved word even though it is not a C reserved word, and I guess it would be a Good Idea for OpenSSL to be callable from C++ as it used to be... Charles B Cranston wrote: We cannot find explicit as a reserved word in a (fairly old) ANSI C book. Is this the GNU compiler

Re: Encrypted attachments

2004-04-01 Thread Dave
OK I did all of that: echo Content-Type: application/x-zip-compressed; /users/email/attach.txt echo name=\$f_name\ /users/email/attach.txt echo Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 /users/email/attach.txt echo Content-Disposition: attachment; /users/email/attach.txt echo

default encryption exponent in RSA

2004-04-01 Thread Reza Curtmola
What is the default encryption exponent used in RSA encryption by OpenSSL? Is it e = 2^16 + 1 = 65537? Anybody knows where can I find this default value in the source files? Thank you! -Reza __ OpenSSL Project

Re: default encryption exponent in RSA

2004-04-01 Thread Charles B Cranston
What is the default encryption exponent used in RSA encryption by OpenSSL? Is it e = 2^16 + 1 = 65537? Anybody knows where can I find this default value in the source files? It's actually the Public Exponent field in the certificate, so you would find it in the code that makes new certificates.