What gives?
no http://www.opensl.org .
No ftp://ftp.openssl.org/ ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k
The Doctor wrote:
What gives?
no http://www.opensl.org .
No ftp://ftp.openssl.org/ ?
they work here for me, except the first one is http://www.openssl.org/
and not http://www.opensl.org/ as you pasted. http://www.openssl.org/
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:41:09PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
no http://www.opensl.org .
http://openssl.org/
--
Viktor.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing
By the way, it's a bit ironic that the SSL certificate is not valid
when accessed through openssl.org (without the www prefix):
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssldb/analyze.html?d=www.openssl.org
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23,
Ivan Ristic wrote:
By the way, it's a bit ironic that the SSL certificate is not valid
when accessed through openssl.org (without the www prefix):
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssldb/analyze.html?d=www.openssl.org
I like the comment there. Confusing.
yes... openssl is confusing.
:D
Hello,
I need to generated PKCS#1 structure from a message hash that I have
calculated.
Can some one please point me to OpenSSL API calls that does this.
Thanks in advance..!
-Anand
Why is the OpenSSL project using GlobalSign Domain Validation? You'd
almost do better going with startssl.com, since theirs automatically
include sAN with the name of the host and the name of the domain
itself.
Oh, and they're free. And trusted by everyone except Opera.
-Kyle H
On Tue, Nov
I would like to post a general observation regarding users of the OpenSSL
toolkit.
A number of the questions hitting this list, are somewhat detailed, and
sometimes deal with interesting corner cases regarding the use of the toolkit.
However, a large number of questions hitting this list
From: Randy Turner rtur...@amalfisystems.com
From the length of some of the threads I've read in the past, a number
of developers seem to be burning a lot of development hours guessing
at how functions are supposed to work
Yes indeed. This is why I often go for commercial software in
Tim Ward wrote:
Yes indeed. This is why I often go for commercial software in preference
fo free - it took me a day and a half to get a working Visual Studio
2005 debug DLL built, at a cost to my client of ... er ... well ... none
of anyone else's business really, but lots more than any
Crypto is hard... mostly because X509 is a dog's breakfast of committee
compromisitis.
That said, openssl docs should AT LEAST address one who is familiar with X509.
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Tim Ward
11 matches
Mail list logo
