Hi Dr,
I already tried using :
openssl pkcs7 -inform DER -in pkcs7.p7
It gives me the same error, which are as follows
net\chint...@symdev1:~/Symphony/Dev/system/dl/sym-licensemanager$ openssl pkcs7
-inform DER -in pkcs7.p7
unable to load PKCS7 object
11381:error:0D0680A8:asn1 encoding
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:59:36AM +0100, OpenSSL wrote:
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 0.9.8m-beta1 of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. This new
OpenSSL version is a security and bug fix beta release which implements
Hi,
I probably have a silly question but, I currently have a bunch of customized
Linux operating systems and on it runs OpenSSL. The version and rpm check
indicates OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008 which is an older version.
Furthermore, the change logs too indicate the latest update as:
OpenSSL
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010, Shotton, Fred wrote:
I'm running apache 2.2.14 with mod_ssl using OpenSSL 0.98m-beta1. When
renegotiating a client session, I get an error from apache: Re-negotiation
handshake failed: Not accepted by client and a fatal unexpected_message
alert in OpenSSL s_client. Below
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010, sandeep kiran p wrote:
Hi,
Can I not include a long name when specifying an OID? Here is a part of my
openssl.cnf file.
HOME = .
RANDFILE = $ENV::HOME/.rnd
oid_section = new_oids
[ new_oids ]
testoid=My Test OID, 1.2.3.4
This gives back an error
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010, Shotton, Fred wrote:
I'm running apache 2.2.14 with mod_ssl using OpenSSL 0.98m-beta1. When
renegotiating a client session, I get an error from apache: Re-negotiation
handshake failed: Not accepted by client and a fatal unexpected_message
alert in OpenSSL s_client.
Let me reframe the last question..
What I meant to say is, could someone provide some info on how to
test/verify whether the openSSL version has in fact been patched to confirm
whether a backport update has in fact occurred?
Thanks,
Shawn
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
Hi, all,
I am new to OpenSSL. I need some help to set up the SSL connection to the SSL
email server.
I have an application to access the email account and retrieve the emails
automatically.
Now, I find that for some email servers, eg. Gmail, the connection should be
SSL.
For the normal
note, also see
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2012645/can-you-help-me-get-my-head-around-openssl-public-key-encryption-with-rsa-h-in-c
Cheers,
Ben.
On 20 January 2010 16:22, Anand Patel anand.apa...@gmail.com wrote:
For RSA API take a look at http://openssl.org/docs/crypto/rsa.html#
The ChangeLog entry:
Version 4.30, 2010.01.21, urgency: LOW/EXPERIMENTAL:
* New features
- Graceful configuration reload with HUP signal on Unix
and with GUI on Windows.
This release involves major modifications of the code.
I expect some regression issues, so please make sure to test this
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010, Shotton, Fred wrote:
I'm running apache 2.2.14 with mod_ssl using OpenSSL 0.98m-beta1.
When renegotiating a client session, I get an error from apache:
Re-negotiation handshake failed: Not accepted by client and a fatal
unexpected_message
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:33:34 -0500, Shotton, Fred fshot...@akamai.com wrote:
I'm running apache 2.2.14 with mod_ssl using OpenSSL 0.98m-beta1. When
renegotiating a client session, I get an error from apache:
Re-negotiation handshake failed: Not accepted by client and a fatal
unexpected_message
Hi,
I have tried to read some of the old posts, but do not understand if the
following is an apache or openssl question.
I am using the apache 2.2.14 mod_ssl with the patch:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.2.14/CVE-2009-3555-2.2.patch
When I test with openssl 0.9.8i the
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010, fredk2 wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to read some of the old posts, but do not understand if the
following is an apache or openssl question.
I am using the apache 2.2.14 mod_ssl with the patch:
Yes I forgot to mention that I did test with the 0.9.8m s_client and that
worked.
The [new] problem 0.9.8m create is that a (old) client can request R and
exhaust all apache threads.
Thanks for the reply - Fred
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010, fredk2 wrote:
Hi,
I
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010, fredk2 wrote:
Yes I forgot to mention that I did test with the 0.9.8m s_client and that
worked.
The [new] problem 0.9.8m create is that a (old) client can request R and
exhaust all apache threads.
This is a bit of a problem for older clients because the
Just to conclude with this:
My process has stopped growing in memory size after about 5 days
which implies that my problem appeared to be a memory management issue (OS
related) and as soon as the
fragmentation from the frees settled, the memory foot print became stable.
Thanks for everyone's
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Locking callbacks are needed for the reference counting in the CRYPTO
library to not get messed up. Various bits of context are associated
withe the new SSL object by reference.
Locking callbacks are required, period. If you are using OpenSSL with
multiple threads,
do I understand this correctly:
0.9.8m sends a no_renegotiation alert and apache needs a mod_ssl patch that,
by default, upon this alert closes the connection?
Thanks - Fred
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010, fredk2 wrote:
Yes I forgot to mention that I did test with the
19 matches
Mail list logo
