Steve & Mounir,
Thanks a lot for answering my questions.
Stuart
- Original Message
From: Dr. Stephen Henson
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 4:38:14 PM
Subject: Re: possible user error / memory leak using RSA_new() and RSA_free();
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010, Stuar
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010, Stuart Weatherby wrote:
> Thanks Steve,
>
> After commenting out lines 24 & 25 there is still unfree'd memory:
>
http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#PROG13
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http:
Thanks Steve,
After commenting out lines 24 & 25 there is still unfree'd memory:
Stuart
==8155== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 4 from 1)
==8155== malloc/free: in use at exit: 528 bytes in 10 blocks.
==8155== malloc/free: 137 allocs, 127 frees, 13,340 bytes allocated.
==81
Hi,
Remove the unecessary call to RSA_new and the memory leak will
disappear!! (The variable p est allocated by PEM_read_RSA_PUBKEY)
Cheers,
--
Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX
http://www.idrix.fr
On 4/19/2010 11:07 PM, Stuart Weatherby wrote:
Hi List,
I am trying to figure out why there is a memory l
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010, Stuart Weatherby wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I am trying to figure out why there is a memory leak using RSA_new & RSA_free:
> Below is a code sample (which will produce a memory leak) and the relevent
> valgrind output. I have checked the documentation but I still fail to see my
I think you need a tutorial in how X.509 hierarchies and chains of trust work.
Consider a public and private key pair: if I have a private key and you have
the corresponding public key, you can decrypt something I encrypt.
This permits all sorts of interesting possibilities:
If I encrypt someth
Hi List,
I am trying to figure out why there is a memory leak using RSA_new & RSA_free:
Below is a code sample (which will produce a memory leak) and the relevent
valgrind output. I have checked the documentation but I still fail to see my
error.
As I understand the docuumentation, RSA_free()
David,
Sorry for my late response. (pulled in another direction for a while).
But i still have a few holes in my understanding (and maybe my head!!).
Here are some facts about our implementation:
1. The server does not have my root certificate.
2. I do not have the server's root certificate.
3.
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:09:33 -0700
"Jeremy Farrell" wrote:
> That's the usual way to handle significant numbers of connections.
> For many programs handling a small number of connections, two threads
> per connection is the normal approach. It's simpler, and much easier
> to port between OSes. Ho
> > > However do you really need to use multiple concurrent threads
> > > with the same SSL object? Think of it as a TCP socket, each
> > > thread has a list of open sockets, or SSL objects, there is
> > > no need to share it with other threads.
>
> "David Schwartz" wrote:
> >
> > Actually, it's
Hi Sads,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Sad Clouds
wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:11:40 -0700
> "David Schwartz" wrote:
>> Sad Clouds wrote:
>>
>> > > 1) According to the FAQ, "an SSL connection may not concurrently
>> > > be used by multiple threads". Does this mean that an SSL
>> > > conne
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:58:51 +0200 (CEST)
Ondrej Jombik wrote:
> I do need this for client side. Machine where connection is
> originating has several IP addresses and the remote machine will
> accept connection only from one of those. So I need to choose exactly
> one source IP address when crea
Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion.
Best regards,
Lutz
- Forwarded message from sumit sengupta -
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024;
t=1271681043; bh=EWieRuvM759TV601L/2vGiP1boYErqP6lbAkC+avdWQ=;
h=Message-ID
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010, Luigi Auriemma wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have noticed that a client ssl connection initialized with the
> classical SSLv23_method no longer works in OpenSSL 1.0.0.
>
> This has been tested on both Windows (mingw) and Linux and both
> connecting to a v2 and v3 server with the same
I do need this for client side. Machine where connection is originating
has several IP addresses and the remote machine will accept connection
only from one of those. So I need to choose exactly one source IP
address when creating connection.
Can your example be modified for this?
Also I noticed
Dear OpneSSL support team
Could you please answer to my questions:
1. What process occurs when we revoke the certificate with the command: openssl
ca -revoke
2. Why openssl software allows to one Certification Authority(CA) to revoke
certificate signed by another CA.
Thank you in advance
Best re
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:35:16 +0200 (CEST)
Ondrej Jombik wrote:
> [ Please Cc me in the answer as I'm not in the list. Thank you. ]
>
> I was googlig for over two days and now I'm stuck. The thing I would
> like to accomplish is to bind outgoing SSL connection to certain IP
> address.
>
> Our se
[ Please Cc me in the answer as I'm not in the list. Thank you. ]
I was googlig for over two days and now I'm stuck. The thing I would
like to accomplish is to bind outgoing SSL connection to certain IP
address.
Our server has several IP addresses, but remote machine will accept
connections only
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:11:40 -0700
"David Schwartz" wrote:
>
> Sad Clouds wrote:
>
> > > 1) According to the FAQ, "an SSL connection may not concurrently
> > > be used by multiple threads". Does this mean that an SSL
> > > connection can be used by different threads provided access is
> > > li
19 matches
Mail list logo
