> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Moisés Barba
Pérez
> Sent: Thursday, 05 May, 2011 14:52
> Firstly I apologize for my insistence about this topic but it is
very important to me.
> I cleared my head a little and I'm exposing my issue again:
Harsh,
I would take up his offer of help. Socket control over multiple
sockets is tricky code and very specific to what you are trying to
do. My environment is single threaded and does similar things to
yours -- but as Gayathri said, there are many details and exceptions
and although with s
On 04/13/2011 07:16 PM, luis hernandez wrote:
Hi
I do not know if you have talk about this here, but I can not find the
answer.
How to translate a command line commandt to a c++ code?
For instance if at commandd prompt i do this: openssl x509 -inform DER
-in cert.cer
There is no single op
On 5/9/2011 6:27 AM, Harshvir Sidhu wrote:
Also i suspect, that if i change the socket to non blocking, then
my current read write code will not work. i mean the one in which i use
FD_SET and select to perform operations.
Thanks.
It's very easy to get things wrong and it won't work unless
Hi.,
Yes, once you make the socket noblocking, your current ssl API,s will
not work. that is why I asked you to write the asynchronous state
machine. Go thro the man pages for ssl accept, ssl read, ssl write for
non blocking cases. You need to handle special cases called want read
and write errors
Hi,
I used the following code to change the socket to non blocking, but its
still not successful, now its not even able to complete SSL_Accept. I am
changing the socket option for the accepted socket.
unsigned long iMode = 1;
int nReturn = ioctlsocket(sock, FIONBIO, &iMode);
This is contrary to the specification: "The total length of an Enhanced
Provider symmetric
key and its salt value cannot be greater than 128 bits."
So, I think this salt value should not have any influence, as the bits you can
set are the
trailing bits between the reduced key size and the one the
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> After a d2i_SSL_SESSION() session has been successfully
> resumed SSL_get_peer_certificate() returns NULL.
> Am I doing something wrong or is that the expected result?
Sorry, wrong test case, it actually works.
--
Arno Garrels
Hi *,
After a d2i_SSL_SESSION() session has been successfully
resumed SSL_get_peer_certificate() returns NULL.
Am I doing something wrong or is that the expected result?
Thanks in advance.
--
Arno Garrels
__
OpenSSL Project