Hello, all :)
I need to link OpenSSL to a library which makes reads/writes itself and
permits only to encrypt data before sending (and decrypt after
receiving). Is it possible to initialize connection as follows
SSL_load_error_strings();
SSL_library_init();
context = SSL_CTX_new(SSLv23_method());
> On Jan 15, 2016, at 8:06 PM, Aaron wrote:
>
> I got the commit number from here:
> http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/Windows-x86-64-build-broken-RE-openssl-users-OpenSSL-version-1-0-1q-released-corrected-download-td61450.html
>
> The commit number was provided by Steve (Dr Stephen N. Henson.
Hi Jeff,
Thank you for your response.
I got the commit number from here:
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/Windows-x86-64-build-broken-RE-openssl-users-OpenSSL-version-1-0-1q-released-corrected-download-td61450.html
The commit number was provided by Steve (Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL
project c
> All right, can the above be committed and any other source-backwards-
> compatible behaviour ?
>
> This will help API developers a lot.
It was done and is part of the yesterday's alpha release.
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mt
t; Can we get developers to come on baord so that
> we can launch a new era without incident?
All right, can the above be committed and any other
source-backwards-compatible behaviour ?
This will help API developers a lot.
BTW, I got openssl-SNAP-20160115 to behave nicely.
--
Member - Liber
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Philippe Levesque
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wanted some input on a problem. I need to use bn_exp for some big
> calculation but I hit a limit where it take age to get a result (after two
> day I stopped the process).
Pure exponentiations without a modular reduction can q
Hi
I wanted some input on a problem. I need to use bn_exp for some big calculation
but I hit a limit where it take age to get a result (after two day I stopped
the process). I tried for fun to run a bn_mod_exp and it took 2 seconds.
The manpage state that;
BN_exp() raises a to the p-th power
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Aaron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone knows how to check what is updated in commit 544058202be49a6 ?
>
According to
http://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git&a=search&st=commit&s=544058202be49a6
, there is no commit by that number.
Jeff
_
Yes, and I can live with this update.
I still think it would be nice to inform the user of what to expect in the
(unlikely but possible) case when his data is not an output of some
cryptographic hash function.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
Or
Hi,
Anyone knows how to check what is updated in commit 544058202be49a6 ?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
View this message in context:
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/How-to-fix-OpenSSL-1-0-1q-Windows-x86-64-build-failure-tp62289p62291.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10 matches
Mail list logo