Re: [openssl-users] Reasons to go from 2.0.9 FOM to 2.0.12 ?

On 08/19/2016 12:43 PM, jonetsu wrote: > Hello, > > We are using FOM 2.0.9 for an embedded product that will go for FIPS > validation. Validation of the full product, that is. All > development so far is with 2.0.9. What would be the reasons, if any, > to update to 2.0.12 before going to the

[openssl-users] Reasons to go from 2.0.9 FOM to 2.0.12 ?

Hello, We are using FOM 2.0.9 for an embedded product that will go for FIPS validation.  Validation of the full product, that is.  All development so far is with 2.0.9.  What would be the reasons, if any, to update to 2.0.12 before going to the lab ? Thanks - comments much appreciated. --

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL FOM 2.0.12 - Windows Compliance

On 08/19/2016 07:20 AM, Imran Ali wrote: > Hi Guys, > > > > I need some help. I am looking for some evidence which I can provide to > my auditor for FOM 2.0.12 is FIPS-140 compliance when compiled and used > in Windows environment. When I look at the NIST web site under >

[openssl-users] OpenSSL FOM 2.0.12 - Windows Compliance

Hi Guys, I need some help. I am looking for some evidence which I can provide to my auditor for FOM 2.0.12 is FIPS-140 compliance when compiled and used in Windows environment. When I look at the NIST web site under http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/140val-all.htm#1747 I