Hello,
Just joined the list, and apologize if the following question was answered
before.
I'm building openssl 1.1.0b on Windows. It is stated that it defaults to
/MD while building openssl, so is there a way to change the linker option
to /MT?
Wei,
regards
--
openssl-users
On 09/26/2016 12:11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> On 09/26/2016 11:01 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > Kssl_calloc calls openssl_malloc which means the data must be
> free'd with openssl_free. And in debug builds any non-free'd data is
> a leak and reported. Ton line 875 the data is allocated and never
>
On 09/26/2016 11:01 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Kssl_calloc calls openssl_malloc which means the data must be free'd with
> openssl_free. And in debug builds any non-free'd data is a leak and reported.
> Ton line 875 the data is allocated and never free'd, so it skips the leak
> detection. In som
Kssl_calloc calls openssl_malloc which means the data must be free'd with
openssl_free. And in debug builds any non-free'd data is a leak and reported.
Ton line 875 the data is allocated and never free'd, so it skips the leak
detection. In some of those other places, perhaps it's because the
Hi -
In kssl.c around line 747, there's a definition of kssl_calloc.
Why, then, on line 875, is there a call to just "calloc" ?
Also line 1230,1262, 2058.
(This is in openssl-1.0.2j)
Thanks.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
> However, out of more ABIs delivered by 1.0.2 compared to 1.0.1, I do not
> understand what is the exact difference between versions 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 .
Perhaps look at the CHANGES file in 1.0.2 and see what's been added? 1.0.1
only gets bugfixes, 1.0.2 adds features, but starting with 1.0.2a on
Hi,
We (BullFreeware project: http://www.bullfreeware.com/) port OpenSSL on AIX,
since ages.
Since BullFreeware is not a distro (we do not deliver packages built
all-together, rather we deliver RPM packages than may stay un-updated during
years), we maintain a compatibility with older versions
Hi -
I'm building OpenSSL 1.0.2j for Windows CE; my build just failed this
morning with an "integral size mismatch in argument."
In crypto\evp\encode.c, there's this declaration:
static unsigned char conv_ascii2bin(unsigned char a);
but in the function int EVP_DecodeUpdate(...)
the call v = con
users should upgrade to 1.0.2j
The issue was reported to OpenSSL on 22nd September 2016 by Bruce Stephens and
Thomas Jakobi. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development
team.
References
==
URL for this Security Advisory:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160926.txt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.1.0b released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
https://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 1.1.0b of our open source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.2j released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
https://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 1.0.2j of our open source
11 matches
Mail list logo