[openssl-users] x509 extension support

2017-01-06 Thread Freemon Johnson
Hello, Can anyone help me in discerning which version of openssl supports sbgp-autonomousSysNum and sbgp-ipAddrBlock? If it has been deprecated then providing the alternative would be greatly appreciated. A sample openssl.cnf is provided below. When I perform a request for req it fails because

[openssl-users] x509 extension support

2017-01-06 Thread Freemon Johnson
Hello, Can anyone help me in discerning which version of openssl supports sbgp-autonomousSysNum and sbgp-ipAddrBlock? If it has been deprecated then providing the alternative would be greatly appreciated. A sample openssl.cnf is provided below. When I perform a request for req it fails because

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl static build linked in DLL does not unload on win32

2017-01-06 Thread Michael Wojcik
> > I'm wondering whether an option to override the default behaviour might > be possible, e.g. an explicit call to OPENSSL_init_crypto() with > something like an OPENSSL_INIT_NO_ATEXIT_CLEANUP option. The > application would then have to call OPENSSL_cleanup() explicitly. Or not, because

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl static build linked in DLL does not unload on win32

2017-01-06 Thread Matt Caswell
On 06/01/17 16:37, Michael Wojcik wrote: >> >> Can you not link against the OpenSSL DLLs rather than statically >> link? That would avoid the problem. > > It introduces other problems. It means either shipping the OpenSSL > DLLs or requiring the customer provide them; the former can have >

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl static build linked in DLL does not unload on win32

2017-01-06 Thread Michael Wojcik
> > Can you not link against the OpenSSL DLLs rather than statically link? > That would avoid the problem. It introduces other problems. It means either shipping the OpenSSL DLLs or requiring the customer provide them; the former can have legal implications (cryptographic export licensing, for

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl static build linked in DLL does not unload on win32

2017-01-06 Thread Ryan Murray
Do you have a moment to edit or review my error Ryan Murray On Jan 6, 2017 10:55 AM, "Matt Caswell" wrote: > > > On 06/01/17 14:36, Dan Heinz wrote: > >>> On 04/01/17 23:11, Dan Heinz wrote: Using openssl 1.1.0c. > >>> > >>> I have a test application that is a win32 console

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl static build linked in DLL does not unload on win32

2017-01-06 Thread Matt Caswell
On 06/01/17 14:36, Dan Heinz wrote: >>> On 04/01/17 23:11, Dan Heinz wrote: Using openssl 1.1.0c. >>> >>> I have a test application that is a win32 console app that calls >>> a win32 DLL which has the openssl libraries linked in >>> statically. >>> >>> The test applications uses late-binding

Re: [openssl-users] Openssl static build linked in DLL does not unload on win32

2017-01-06 Thread Dan Heinz
>>On 04/01/17 23:11, Dan Heinz wrote: >> Using openssl 1.1.0c. >> >> I have a test application that is a win32 console app that calls a >> win32 DLL which has the openssl libraries linked in statically. >> >> The test applications uses late-binding to the DLL and calls >> LoadLibrary for the