Re: [openssl-users] RSA_method_set_sign

2017-02-27 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Saturday 25 February 2017 12:22:09 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > You can set the values in place using something like this: > > unsigned char *tmps = NULL; > int tmpslen; > X509_SIG *sig = X509_SIG_new(); > X509_ALGOR *alg; > ASN1_OCTET_STRING *digest; > X509_SIG_getm(sig, , ); >

Re: [openssl-users] How to override methods in EVP_PKEY_METHOD structure that is attached to a EVP_PKEY_CTX?

2017-02-27 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, Stephan M?hlstrasser wrote: > Am 27.02.17 um 15:34 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson: > > >There shouldn't be any need to add the method to the list: it should be > >possible to associate an EVP_PKEY with a non-default method (e.g. explicitly > >or implemented in an ENGINE). I say

Re: [openssl-users] How to override methods in EVP_PKEY_METHOD structure that is attached to a EVP_PKEY_CTX?

2017-02-27 Thread Stephan Mühlstrasser
Am 27.02.17 um 15:34 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, Stephan M?hlstrasser wrote: How is it supposed to be possible to retrieve the original operations from an EVP_PKEY_METHOD pointer? Ah I see you're using OpenSSL 1.0.2. There isn't a way to get the existing function

Re: [openssl-users] How to override methods in EVP_PKEY_METHOD structure that is attached to a EVP_PKEY_CTX?

2017-02-27 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, Stephan M?hlstrasser wrote: > Steve, > > Am 25.02.17 um 05:53 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson: > >On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, Stephan M?hlstrasser wrote: > >... > >>Is it possible to override methods in an EVP_PKEY_METHOD structure, > >>or would it be necessary to implement a whole

Re: [openssl-users] POODLE attack on TLS1.2

2017-02-27 Thread Richard Könning
On 27.02.2017 13:03, Akshar Kanak wrote: Dear Team In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE , It is mentioned that POODLE attack is possible aganist *TLS *also . has this issue been alredy addressed in openssl . Thanks and regards Akshar As the corresponding section in the Wikipedia

Re: [openssl-users] POODLE attack on TLS1.2

2017-02-27 Thread Matt Caswell
On 27/02/17 12:03, Akshar Kanak wrote: > Dear Team >In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE , It is mentioned that > POODLE attack is possible aganist *TLS *also . has this issue been > alredy addressed in openssl . This was never an issue in OpenSSL - so there is nothing to address.

[openssl-users] POODLE attack on TLS1.2

2017-02-27 Thread Akshar Kanak
Dear Team In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE , It is mentioned that POODLE attack is possible aganist *TLS *also . has this issue been alredy addressed in openssl . Thanks and regards Akshar -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: