[openssl-users] Regarding Openssl 1.0.2p bn changes

Hi, I have doubt regarding the bn change in Openssl version 1.0.2p. There is new flag introduced BN_FLG_FIXED_TOP, value of this flag is zero untill BN_DEBUG is defined. By default BN_DEBUG is not defined. So what is the purpose of this flag.? Regards Mwnish -- openssl-users mailing list To

[openssl-users] TLSv1.3, TLS_AE3_256_GMC_SHA384

Wtf do I have to do now? Thank you Get Outlook for Android -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[openssl-users] help I'm lost

Get Outlook for Android -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.1.1 pre-7 or pre-8 connect to 1.1.1 pre-9 oddity?

On 08/23/2018 10:12 PM, Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote: I find it interesting that openssl 1.1.1-pre7 can not connect to a server which has openssl 1.1.1-pre9 in place. Nor can Firefox nightly. This is to be expected. Pre-9 implements the official RFC version of TLS 1.3, while th

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.1.1 pre-7 or pre-8 connect to 1.1.1 pre-9 oddity?

On 08/23/2018 10:12 PM, Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote: I find it interesting that openssl 1.1.1-pre7 can not connect to a server which has openssl 1.1.1-pre9 in place. Nor can Firefox nightly. This is to be expected. Pre-9 implements the official RFC version of TLS 1.3, while th

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.1.1 pre-7 or pre-8 connect to 1.1.1 pre-9 oddity?

I find it interesting that openssl 1.1.1-pre7 can not connect to a server which has openssl 1.1.1-pre9 in place. Nor can Firefox nightly. This is to be expected. Pre-9 implements the official RFC version of TLS 1.3, while the earlier beta releases implement drafts. One of the major diff

[openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.1.1 pre-7 or pre-8 connect to 1.1.1 pre-9 oddity?

I find it interesting that openssl 1.1.1-pre7 can not connect to a server which has openssl 1.1.1-pre9 in place. Nor can Firefox nightly. $ /usr/local/bin/openssl version OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre7 (beta) 29 May 2018 $ /usr/local/bin/openssl s_client -connect 68.179.116.201:443 -tls1_3 CONNECTED(000

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.1 pre release 9 published

On 23/08/18 15:35, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > building my own 1.1.1 pre9 for testing. Note - you would have to build off of git master to get the usability fixes since 1.1.1-pre9 was created prior them being merged. Matt > Wait to push the draft out until 1.1.1 is fully released. > Fudge the dr

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.1 pre release 9 published

On 08/23/2018 09:00 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote: On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 20:08 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 08/22/2018 11:48 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: On 22/08/18 00:53, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 08/21/2018 06:31 PM, Matt Caswell wrote: On 21/08/18 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Thanks! Once F

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.1.1 pre release 9 published

On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 20:08 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 08/22/2018 11:48 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > > On 22/08/18 00:53, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > > > On 08/21/2018 06:31 PM, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > > On 21/08/18 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > >

Re: [openssl-users] Backup of existing ssl connection

>I want to take backup of existing ssl connection. Use this backup connection >in other slave board. This backup include keys and sequence no, ssl version >etc. >Is Openssl support any api to take backup of existing ssl connection? No. This is not currently possible, and is unlikely to ever ha

[openssl-users] Backup of existing ssl connection

Hi I want to take backup of existing ssl connection. Use this backup connection in other slave board. This backup include keys and sequence no, ssl version etc. Is Openssl support any api to take backup of existing ssl connection? Regards Manish -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: htt

Re: [openssl-users] How to Implement a new PubKey method correctly

On 22/08/18 15:55, Dr. Pala wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working on providing a new Public Key method that will handle > Composite Keys (i.e., multiple keys with different algos - e.g., one RSA > and one EC) and Composite Signatures  (i.e., multiple signatures > generated with the corresponding Com