Re: [openssl-users] More secure use of DSA?

Do you have something I can read up on? On 09/02/16 12:09, Salz, Rich wrote: I thought DSA was more secure than RSA? Granted, "I thought" is a newbie understanding. This is completely wrong. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-users] More secure use of DSA?

Rich, I thought DSA was more secure than RSA? Granted, "I thought" is a newbie understanding. Leam On 09/02/16 11:57, Salz, Rich wrote: Unless you have to interoperate with other systems, *do not use DSA.* If you re-use a the random, the entire key can be be exposed. Crypto is hard

[openssl-users] More secure use of DSA?

Thanks to Matt Caswell for helping me fix the DSA question. His solution, based of the information I provided, was: openssl genpkey -genparam -algorithm DSA -pkeyopt \ dsa_paramgen_bits:2048 -out dsa.params openssl genpkey -paramfile dsa.params -out dsa.key Which

Re: [openssl-users] genpkey DSA error

On 08/26/16 18:51, Matt Caswell wrote: DSA needs parameters specifying. Try this: openssl genpkey -genparam -algorithm DSA -pkeyopt dsa_paramgen_bits:2048 -out dsa.params openssl genpkey -paramfile dsa.params -out dsa.key Matt Matt, thanks! That was it. Leam -- openssl-users mailing

[openssl-users] genpkey DSA error

More than likely it's operator error. OS Version: CentOS 6, patched. openssl version: OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013 Works: openssl genpkey -algorithm RSA -out fred_ssl.key ++ ++ Fails: openssl genpkey -algorithm DSA