.0.5.
See https://www.openssl.org/source/ for the link to openssl-3.0.5.tar.gz and
signatures.
--
Olivier Mascia
convention intended to be stable over the 3.x life? Or would it
change for things like libcrypto-3.1.dll (or the like) with releases like 3.1.x?
__
Best Regards, Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Mit
freundlichen Grüßen,
Olivier Mascia
contributing to OpenSSL have put into 3.0 codebase. 😉
__
Best Regards, Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Mit
freundlichen Grüßen,
Olivier Mascia
e groeten, Mit
freundlichen Grüßen,
Olivier Mascia
th 'no-deprecated' at Configure step and didn't want to
relax that for 3.0 :)
__
Best Regards, Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Mit
freundlichen Grüßen,
Olivier Mascia
) builds
Is this naming convention intended to be stable over the 3.x life? Or would it
change for things like libcrypto-3.1.dll (or the like) with releases like 3.1.x?
__
Best Regards, Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Mit
freundlichen Grüßen,
Olivier Mascia
tations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Mit
freundlichen Grüßen,
Olivier Mascia
> Le 30 juil. 2021 à 15:07, Dr Paul Dale a écrit :
>
> Try: include/openssl/core_names.h
> The names are "n", "e" and "d" in this case.
>
>
> Pauli
>
>
>
can I find the proper names for these bignums out of a
RSA key?
__
Best Regards, Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Mit
freundlichen Grüßen,
Olivier Mascia
r code should actually do SSL_connect at that
time instead of SSL_do_handshake.
SSL* connection = SSL_new(ctx);
SSL_set_bio(connection,bio,bio);
if (SSL_connect(mSSL_con) != 1)
{
...
--
Olivier Mascia
__
Op
Are there searchable archives of this mailing-list?
I'd like to look them up before posting questions.
Thanks,
--
Olivier Mascia
;aaa' is not
any better, 'a,)GZ$-(' might be a not so bad choice though a bit
short and I'd fear they would write it on a post-it note on the
screen...
--
Olivier Mascia
to something else since.
Thanks again for the initial useful comments. The remaining of the
thread was... interesting. ;-)
--
Olivier Mascia
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User
the _ex version, calling DH_new
() first and passing 0 for the BN_GENCB (callback) which I don't need
for now.
Am I driving in the wrong lane?
--
Olivier Mascia
__
OpenSSL Project
only upgrade to secured channel at a later stage (when protocol
switch to non-HTTP).
Thanks so much (Victor and David) for these answers,
--
Olivier Mascia
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.o
ablish a secure link between
both of us, so please don't make too much waves about me being self-
signed" ?
--
Olivier Mascia
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
cceed.
And the ms\test all pass.
I would appreciate whoever is in charge of the win32 build maintenance
to double-check this for me and update the build procedure before next
beta or release.
Thank you very much,
--
Olivier Mascia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s3_srvr.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _OpenSSLDie
out32dll\ssleay32.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x460'
Stop.
----
Thanks you
gt;
> Check out demos/x509/mkcert.c
I suppose I will then have to upgrade to 0.9.7 beta so ?
I checked the tree of 0.9.6 which I use for production now and I have no
x506 subdir in demos.
--
Olivier Mascia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_
ng
the existing code, there does not seem to any "programmer's
documentation".
--
Olivier Mascia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support
authorities toward this or that private key size ?
I thought of using rsa 1024 bits. Is it considered way too much, just
fine or less than adequate for the purpose ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier Mascia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
OpenSSL P
TLSv1 a good choice, knowing I could choose any and impose it in
this particular case ?
C) Is there some good background documentation on "choosing the right
cypher for the task" ?
Thank you very much,
--
Olivier Mascia &l
21 matches
Mail list logo