On Tue, May 09, 2006, Takurou Saitou wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Will a revision about CA.pl be pointed at the following revisions?
>
[patch]
That's one, the other is:
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=15220
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
OpenSSL project cor
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>OpenSSL version 0.9.8b and 0.9.7j released
>==
>
>OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
>http://www.openssl.org/
>
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 05 May 2006 02:25:57 +0200 (CEST),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
richard> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 4 May 2006 17:14:01 -0700,
Randy Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
richard>
richard> rturner> Is there a brief on the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 4 May 2006 17:14:01 -0700, Randy Turner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rturner> Is there a brief on the reasons why someone would want to use
rturner> OpenSSL 0.9.7j or choose to use 0.9.8b?
There are two answers to that. You nailed one of them:
rturner> I be
Hi,
Is there a brief on the reasons why someone would want to use OpenSSL
0.9.7j or choose to use 0.9.8b?
I believe one of the items is that the 0.9.7 branch can be part of a
solution for FIPS compliance, where 0.9.8b is "not there" yet.
Is this correct? I'm at a point where I need to d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.8b and 0.9.7j released
==
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 0.9.
