Jakob,
Thank you very much for your feedback. I think it makes sense to use something
more modern with more support and more users.
Thank you for your prompt response.
Mauricio
Sent from my Ipad Ignore any typos
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
>
> On 12/09/2016 21:11,
On 12/09/2016 21:11, Salz, Rich wrote:
I cannot speak for the project, but Visual Studio 6.0 seems sufficiently old
that I would not expect it to be a supported toolchain.
Yeah, wow, 1998?
Not supported.
VC 6.0 was the official Microsoft compiler until the release
of Visual Studio.NET 2002.
> I cannot speak for the project, but Visual Studio 6.0 seems sufficiently old
> that I would not expect it to be a supported toolchain.
Yeah, wow, 1998?
Not supported.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Ben,
Thanks for your prompt answer. I was thinking the same... but was hoping
someone had been able to compile and give me some ideas...
I'll wait for additional feedback - hoping for the impossible. We should
not be using 20 year compiler to do this - agree...
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:31 PM, B
On 09/12/2016 10:57 AM, Mauricio Rodriguez wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have been able to compile 1.1.0 with no issues using just about all
> versions of VStudio .NET2003/2005/2008/2010. So, all good there.
> However, the compilation process using Visual studio 6 has not been
> smooth and still fails. H
Hello,
I have been able to compile 1.1.0 with no issues using just about all
versions of VStudio .NET2003/2005/2008/2010. So, all good there. However,
the compilation process using Visual studio 6 has not been smooth and still
fails. Here is the environment I am using:
- CL.exe - Microsoft (
