>> Sorry, never mind. After taking a closer look at the source code I saw
>> that there are further compile time and run-time kernel version
>> checks in e_afalg.c. I adjusted the version number and got that to
>> work now.
>
> Well, why does the afalg engine depend on Linux 4.1?
> AF_ALG is part
On 22/02/17 20:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 22.02.2017 um 12:24 schrieb David Oberhollenzer:
>> Sorry, never mind. After taking a closer look at the source code I saw
>> that there are further compile time and run-time kernel version
>> checks in e_afalg.c. I adjusted the version number
Am 22.02.2017 um 12:24 schrieb David Oberhollenzer:
> Sorry, never mind. After taking a closer look at the source code I saw
> that there are further compile time and run-time kernel version
> checks in e_afalg.c. I adjusted the version number and got that to
> work now.
Well, why does the afalg
On 22/02/17 09:11, David Oberhollenzer wrote:
> Running readelf on afalg.so confirms that the symbol is indeed not
> in the binary. Am I missing some magic configure options or is there
> some other problem?
I just tried the exact same Configure line as you on 1.1.0e and it all
works fine:
$
Hi,
I'm trying to compile OpenSSL 1.1.0e with the afalg engine on a
recent CentOS 7. I removed the kernel version check for the
afalg engine from the Configure script since AFAIK the CentOS
kernel should have all of that back ported. I ran the following
configure command:
$ ./Configure
