There are still many broken symbolic links in the new 1.0.2e tarball:
Example:
>ls -l ./test/ecdsatest.c
lrwxrwxrwx 1 normg smalltalk 42 Dec 3 06:44 ./test/ecdsatest.c ->
openssl-1.0.2e/../crypto/ecdsa/ecdsatest.c
>cat ./test/ecdsatest.c
cat: ./test/ecdsatest.c: No such file or directory
Are these sym links going to remain this way in subsequent releases? Or
will they revert back to the way they were in 1.0.2d? Merging changes
like this into svn is a pain because it causes conflicts.
Norm Green
On 12/3/15 13:31, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 03/12/15 21:27, Norm Green wrote:
On 03/12/15 21:37, Norm Green wrote:
> Are these sym links going to remain this way in subsequent releases? Or
> will they revert back to the way they were in 1.0.2d? Merging changes
> like this into svn is a pain because it causes conflicts.
They won't remain broken. It's undecided whether
On 03/12/15 21:27, Norm Green wrote:
> There are still many broken symbolic links in the new 1.0.2e tarball:
>
> Example:
>>ls -l ./test/ecdsatest.c
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 normg smalltalk 42 Dec 3 06:44 ./test/ecdsatest.c ->
> openssl-1.0.2e/../crypto/ecdsa/ecdsatest.c
>>cat ./test/ecdsatest.c
> cat:
