Thanks for the links. I understand it's a real issue. The concern is will
windows return EACCESS for cases when there really is access denied?
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
, warning on all others
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 16:37
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default
/usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes failure on AIX, warning on all
/usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 16:37
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default
/usr/local/ssl
, warning on all others
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 16:37
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default
/usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes failure on AIX, warning on all
/usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 16:37
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default
/usr/local/ssl
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Koehne Kai
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 04:03
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
This reminds me
/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
This reminds me of
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2644user=guestpass=guest
,
though it's in another code path ... Over time I met at least 4 other
people
who ran into exactly this issue on Windows, so
There's been a patch that's been ignored in the bug tracker for ages to at
least minimise this problem on Windows by treating EACCESS the same as EPERM
to handle the case of removable disks.
Do you know the ticket number? I vaguely recall it but can't find immediately
find it. I know when
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:06:47PM +, Richard Moore wrote:
This is an interesting one because the problem is clear - the openssl
utility exits if it gets any error other than file doesn't exist trying
to open its configuration file - but the solution is not.
The real problem isn't
The ones I can find are:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3263
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2644
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3488
Two which seem to be suggesting the same fix. I'm also aware of bugs in
the Qt bug tracker, my work's internal bug
Thanks for the links. I understand it's a real issue. The concern is will
windows return EACCESS for cases when there really is access denied?
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:22:22PM +, Salz, Rich wrote:
Thanks for the links. I understand it's a real issue. The
concern is will windows return EACCESS for cases when there really
is access denied?
I think we're asking the wrong questions here. Whatever the error,
the decision to
Or are we talking about something other than OPENSSL_config() exiting
when the config file cannot be read?
It's a variant of this. File not existing is silently ignored. Windows will
return EACCESS if the drive isn't ready, and that is not silently ignored. The
concern is if windows will
On 23 January 2015 at 17:22, Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com wrote:
Thanks for the links. I understand it's a real issue. The concern is
will windows return EACCESS for cases when there really is access denied?
No, if it's file permissions you get EPERM. EACCESS is weirder things like
opening
No, if it's file permissions you get EPERM. EACCESS is weirder things like
opening a directory fopen(), see
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5814770t.aspx
Ah, thanks. Okay, we can fix that :)
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe:
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Koehne Kai
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 04:03
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
This reminds me
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 16:37
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
I can't
None of the hosts we've visited have /usr/local/ssl, not to mention the
actual default file. In fact, on some, even non-AIX hosts, permissions would
suggest that the permission should be returned.
Not sure what that last sentence means.
Should this be happening? Is AIX simply less
] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
Thank you Rich.
The sentence you couldn't understand is my bad, s/b:
In fact, on some, even non-AIX hosts, permissions would suggest that the
permission error should be returned.
Dave
This message
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Wojcik
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:16 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
(Apologies
Hi. I'm running openssl CLI 1.0.1j (for example) on a bunch of different unix
platforms. On all of them, the default missing /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
causes a warning, but the CLI continues to initialize and opens the command
line. We've known about this behavior since first
None of the hosts we've visited have /usr/local/ssl, not to mention the
actual default file. In fact, on some, even non-AIX hosts, permissions would
suggest that the permission should be returned.
Not sure what that last sentence means.
Should this be happening? Is AIX simply less
, January 22, 2015 1:22 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
None of the hosts we've visited have /usr/local/ssl, not to mention the
actual default file. In fact, on some, even non
] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
Thank you Rich.
The sentence you couldn't understand is my bad, s/b:
In fact, on some, even non-AIX hosts, permissions would suggest that the
permission error should be returned.
Dave
This message
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 13:22
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
Should
I can't. The behavior of fopen is defined by ISO 9899 and the Single UNIX
Specfication, which AIX has adhered to for well over a decade.
I meant no disrespect to big blue :) I worked there for a half-decade, and
also with them on standards for a lot longer...
int main(void)
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 16:37
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
I can't
27 matches
Mail list logo
