, Peter Kurrasch gtin...@hotmail.com [9] wrote:
Are you combining version 1.0.1 and 1.0.0 ?
From:
salatiel.fi...@gmail.com [1] Subject: Can not enable via padlock Date:
Wed, 30 May 2012 20:26:45 -0300 To: openssl-users@openssl.org [2] I am
trying to test
...@gmail.com
Subject: Can not enable via padlock
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:26:45 -0300
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
I am trying to test via padlock using 'openssl speed -engine padlock', but
it fails.
# openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
# openssl engine padlock
140291115067048:error
:
Are you combining version 1.0.1 and 1.0.0 ?
From: salatiel.fi...@gmail.com
Subject: Can not enable via padlock
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:26:45 -0300
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
I am trying to test via padlock using 'openssl speed -engine padlock
30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Peter Kurrasch gtin...@hotmail.com wrote:
Are you combining version 1.0.1 and 1.0.0 ?
From: salatiel.fi...@gmail.com
Subject: Can not enable via padlock
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:26:45 -0300
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
?
From: salatiel.fi...@gmail.com
Subject: Can not enable via padlock
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:26:45 -0300
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
I am trying to test via padlock using 'openssl speed -engine padlock',
but it fails.
# openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
I am trying to test via padlock using 'openssl speed -engine padlock', but it
fails.
# openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
# openssl engine padlock
140291115067048:error:260B606D:engine routines:DYNAMIC_LOAD:init
failed:eng_dyn.c:521:
140291115067048:error:2606A074:engine
Are you combining version 1.0.1 and 1.0.0 ?
From: salatiel.fi...@gmail.com
Subject: Can not enable via padlock
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:26:45 -0300
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
I am trying to test via padlock using 'openssl speed -engine padlock