> What does your implementation do differently, and which platforms does it
> work on?
It is still an early prototype, but it already allows dynamic expansion of the
secure heap (as well as shrinking) and I hope to add support for Microsoft
Windows after the POSIX / Linux implementation.
The intent is that you replace the upper layer, CRYPTO_secure_x
What does your implementation do differently, and which platforms does it work
on?
| Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
> On 5 May 2019, at 11:15 pm, Tobias Nießen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been experimenting with a custom secure heap implementation recently.
> Would OpenSSL be open to a patch that a
Hello,
I have been experimenting with a custom secure heap implementation recently.
Would OpenSSL be open to a patch that allows users to replace the OpenSSL
implementation with their own, similarly to how CRYPTO_set_mem_functions works?
Based on mem_sec.c, at least sh_malloc, sh_free
