در تاریخ چهارشنبه ۲۹ ژانویهٔ ۲۰۲۰، ۰:۰۵ Viktor Dukhovni <
openssl-us...@dukhovni.org> نوشت:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:24:06PM +, Dan Heinz wrote:
>
> > >RSA is not intended for bulk data decryption, its intended uses are
> > >key transport and signing. Bulk data decryption is done via AES
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:24:06PM +, Dan Heinz wrote:
> >RSA is not intended for bulk data decryption, its intended uses are
> >key transport and signing. Bulk data decryption is done via AES or
> >similar.
It sounds like you're directly encrypting data with RSA. That's a
mistake. RSA is
Thank you for the information, Victor.
>> I upgraded a library that used OpenSSL 1.0.2 to the OpenSSL 1.1.1d.
>> On Windows, I have found that the time to decrypt had doubled. After
>> a bit of timestamp logging, I found the RSA_private_decrypt function
>> is taking twice as long with 1.1.1d as
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 06:20:27PM +, Dan Heinz wrote:
> I upgraded a library that used OpenSSL 1.0.2 to the OpenSSL 1.1.1d.
> On Windows, I have found that the time to decrypt had doubled. After
> a bit of timestamp logging, I found the RSA_private_decrypt function
> is taking twice as long
I upgraded a library that used OpenSSL 1.0.2 to the OpenSSL 1.1.1d. On
Windows, I have found that the time to decrypt had doubled.
After a bit of timestamp logging, I found the RSA_private_decrypt function is
taking twice as long with 1.1.1d as it did with 1.0.2t. This is being called
from a W
