andrew> Presumably the fix is to link against a library which has
andrew> t_time defined as something larger (or at least unsigned) -
andrew> does such a library exist?
Yes. Solaris 7 (on Sparc) has 64 bit time_t, and thus the libc that
comes with it does as well. I think that True64 Unix (on A
Rodney Thayer wrote:
>
> you should be able to go to at least 2049, as the PKIX limit
> is around 2050. I know some vendors have tested this.
PKIX is not limited to 2050, it simply changes format at that point. The
problem is, presumably, that the date calculation is not carried out in
an appro
you should be able to go to at least 2049, as the PKIX limit
is around 2050. I know some vendors have tested this.
At 06:28 PM 1/3/00 +, Andrew Cooke wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Not really a open-ssl bug, but it's interesting and I'm curious to hear
>how people will be dealing with it: has anyone tried
Hi,
Not really a open-ssl bug, but it's interesting and I'm curious to hear
how people will be dealing with it: has anyone tried to make a
certificate that lasts for the next century? We tried (just because we
were fed up with test certificates expiring) and found that we couldn't
get past 2037
