* Scott Gifford wrote on Wed, May 20, 2009 at 21:52 -0400:
AngelWarrior srikanth.bemin...@gmail.com writes:
but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.I dont
know if the client will be have a CA certificate to
authenticate it.If I am wrong please explain me how it can be
* AngelWarrior wrote on Wed, May 20, 2009 at 15:18 -0500:
I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after
contact my messages should be private.
If you sent your message to just anybody, how can it be private?
oki,
Steffen
--[ End of message
Hi,
I need some Info.I have a client and server application which requires a
secure medium for the transferring of data between each other. Currently I
am using openssl to achieve this using private and public key certificates
with RSA encryption. I don't want to ship the certificate with each
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 02:37:58PM -0500, AngelWarrior wrote:
I need some Info.I have a client and server application which requires a
secure medium for the transferring of data between each other. Currently I
am using openssl to achieve this using private and public key certificates
with RSA
AngelWarrior srikanth.bemin...@gmail.com writes:
I need some Info.I have a client and server application which
requires a secure medium for the transferring of data between each
other. Currently I am using openssl to achieve this using private
and public key certificates with RSA encryption.
forgot to say at step 7 and 8 agreed upon encryption algorithm
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:18 PM, AngelWarrior
srikanth.bemin...@gmail.comwrote:
Thank you for replying.
I am thinking of this design.Is this feasible.My design approach is mainly
based on
I dont need to know with whom I am
but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.I dont know if the
client will be have a CA certificate to authenticate it.If I am wrong please
explain me how it can be done.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Scott Gifford sgiff...@suspectclass.comwrote:
AngelWarrior
AngelWarrior srikanth.bemin...@gmail.com writes:
but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.
I dont know if the client will be have a CA certificate
to authenticate it.If I am wrong please explain me how
it can be done.
The server must have or know something that an attacker
AngelWarrior srikanth.bemin...@gmail.com writes:
but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.
I dont know if the client will be have a CA certificate
to authenticate it.If I am wrong please explain me how
it can be done.
The server must have or know something that an
Thank you for replying.
I am thinking of this design.Is this feasible.My design approach is mainly
based on
I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after contact my messages
should be private.
client(My own application)
Server (My own application)
1.(client)create a normal socket and
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:18:34PM -0500, AngelWarrior wrote:
Thank you for replying.
I am thinking of this design.Is this feasible.My design approach is mainly
based on
I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after contact my messages
should be private.
For pseudonymous security,
AngelWarrior wrote:
Thank you for replying.
I am thinking of this design.Is this feasible.My design approach
is mainly based on
I dont need to know with whom I am contacting but after contact
my messages should be private.
I don't think this is a coherent approach unless you layer some kind
AngelWarrior srikanth.bemin...@gmail.com writes:
but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.I dont know if the
client will be have a CA certificate to authenticate it.If I am wrong please
explain me how it can be done.
Regular SSL only requires a certificate on the server.
AngelWarrior wrote:
but this still requires a CA kind of certificate right.
I dont know if the client will be have a CA certificate
to authenticate it.If I am wrong please explain me how
it can be done.
The usual solution (as used on secure web pages, for credit card orders, and
so on) is
14 matches
Mail list logo
