Yay,
there are some controversial discussions taking place on
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/9078
It would be great if you could join us and provide more details about the
circumstances of your issue. In particular, information like kernel/os version
and whether the significant
Hi,
I opened an issue on GitHub to discuss this problem in more detail.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/9078
It would be nice if you could join the discussion there.
Matthias
@Jay: in particular I'm interested to learn, which linux version and
distribution
you were using. On
Correction, Tomáš was correct: there is an ` # ifndef DEVRANDOM` surrounding
the problematic code:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/OpenSSL_1_1_1c/e_os.h#L25-L34
Neverthelesss, I still think this code needs to be changed, because the seeding
should just work correctly out-of-the-box
> To workaround the /dev/random blocking issue, you can just add:
>
> -DDEVRANDOM="\"/dev/urandom\""
>
> as a parameter to ./Configure
>
> This will remove the special handling of /dev/urandom and /dev/random
> in 1.1.1c.
Tomáš, Jay,
I'm afraid this suggestion won't help, because
On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 10:39 -0700, Jay Foster wrote:
> I built OpenSSL 1.1.1c from the recent release, but have noticed
> what
> seems like a significant performance drop compared with 1.1.1b. I
> notice this when starting lighttpd. With 1.1.1b, lighttpd starts in
> a
> few seconds, but with
Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote in <23f8b94d-0078-af3c-b46a-929b9d005\
4...@wisemo.com>:
|On 28/05/2019 23:48, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Jay Foster wrote in <84571f12-68b3-f7ee-7896-c891a2e25...@roadrunner.com\
|> >:
|>|On 5/28/2019 10:39 AM, Jay Foster wrote:
|>|> I built OpenSSL 1.1.1c
On 28/05/2019 23:48, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
Jay Foster wrote in <84571f12-68b3-f7ee-7896-c891a2e25...@roadrunner.com>:
|On 5/28/2019 10:39 AM, Jay Foster wrote:
|> I built OpenSSL 1.1.1c from the recent release, but have noticed what
|> seems like a significant performance drop compared
> I think I have tracked down the change in 1.1.1c that is causing this.
> It is the addition of the DEVRANDOM_WAIT functionality for linux in
> e_os.h and crypto/rand/rand_unix.c. lighttpd (libcrypto) is waiting in
> a select() call on /dev/random. After this eventually wakes up, it then
>
jayf0s...@roadrunner.com said:
> I think I have tracked down the change in 1.1.1c that is causing this. It
> is the addition of the DEVRANDOM_WAIT functionality for linux in e_os.h and
> crypto/rand/rand_unix.c. lighttpd (libcrypto) is waiting in a select() call
> on /dev/random. ...
I
I also noticed that with 1.1.1b, the CFLAGS automatically included
'-Wall -O3', but with 1.1.1c, '-Wall -O3' is no longer included in the
CFLAGS. was this dropped? I added '-Wall -O3' to the CFLAGS, but this
did not seem to have any affect on the performance issue (unrelated?).
This is
Jay Foster wrote in <84571f12-68b3-f7ee-7896-c891a2e25...@roadrunner.com>:
|On 5/28/2019 10:39 AM, Jay Foster wrote:
|> I built OpenSSL 1.1.1c from the recent release, but have noticed what
|> seems like a significant performance drop compared with 1.1.1b. I
|> notice this when starting
On 5/28/2019 10:39 AM, Jay Foster wrote:
I built OpenSSL 1.1.1c from the recent release, but have noticed what
seems like a significant performance drop compared with 1.1.1b. I
notice this when starting lighttpd. With 1.1.1b, lighttpd starts in a
few seconds, but with 1.1.1c, it takes
I built OpenSSL 1.1.1c from the recent release, but have noticed what
seems like a significant performance drop compared with 1.1.1b. I
notice this when starting lighttpd. With 1.1.1b, lighttpd starts in a
few seconds, but with 1.1.1c, it takes several minutes.
I also noticed that with
13 matches
Mail list logo
