On Sun January 1 2012, grarpamp wrote:
> > Translation: I have to agree with O.P. - It looks broke to me too. ;-)
>
> Heh, that's precisely what I said in my report :) The front end
> options to do it seem to exist, and they even have some brief
> descriptions as such. They just don't work :)
>
> Translation: I have to agree with O.P. - It looks broke to me too. ;-)
Heh, that's precisely what I said in my report :) The front end
options to do it seem to exist, and they even have some brief
descriptions as such. They just don't work :)
'zlib' should get us static inclusion.
'zlib-dynam
On Tue December 27 2011, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Tue December 27 2011, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> > On Tue December 27 2011, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > > On 12/26/2011 1:31 AM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> > > > On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
> > > >> Merry Christmas, and thanks to
On Tue December 27 2011, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Tue December 27 2011, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > On 12/26/2011 1:31 AM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> > > On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
> > >> Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
> > >> specific
> >
On Tue December 27 2011, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On 12/26/2011 1:31 AM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> > On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
> >> Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
> >> specific
> >> option to do this in manually written Makefiles.
> >>
> >
On 12/26/2011 1:31 AM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
specific
option to do this in manually written Makefiles.
My replies below are about how to achieve this without GNU specific
On Sun December 25 2011, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
> Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
> specific
> option to do this in manually written Makefiles.
>
> My replies below are about how to achieve this without GNU specific options
> and without having to edit t
Merry Christmas, and thanks to Michael for pointing out a GNU gcc/ld
specific
option to do this in manually written Makefiles.
My replies below are about how to achieve this without GNU specific options
and without having to edit the Configure and Makefiles. These answers do
not apply to Window
On Mon December 19 2011, grarpamp wrote:
> I have a case that needs zlib statically in openssl.
> But I can't seem to make that. Only dynamic is made.
>
> For testing I put zlib125 in its own .
> Then for openssl...
>
> ./config
> --prefix=
> --with-zlib-include=/include
> --with-zlib-lib=/lib
>
> 1. Make sure there is a libz.a in /lib or /usr/lib, otherwise you have no
> static zlib to link in.
Of course there's an old libz.a there. And it should not matter as
we're given the --with-zlib arguments to point the build elsewhere
for those libraries. And as seen in the report, it is followin
On 12/19/2011 10:38 AM, grarpamp wrote:
I have a case that needs zlib statically in openssl.
But I can't seem to make that. Only dynamic is made.
For testing I put zlib125 in its own.
Then for openssl...
./config
--prefix=
--with-zlib-include=/include
--with-zlib-lib=/lib
shared
zlib
make
make
I have a case that needs zlib statically in openssl.
But I can't seem to make that. Only dynamic is made.
For testing I put zlib125 in its own .
Then for openssl...
./config
--prefix=
--with-zlib-include=/include
--with-zlib-lib=/lib
shared
zlib
make
make install
This gives...
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=
12 matches
Mail list logo