onger than using bio
pairs.
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org on behalf of adam.gross...@devitron.com
Sent: Sat 1/16/2010 2:01 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Detecting TLS/SSL connection
> Adam Grossman wrote:
>
>> One last questions, and
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010, adam.gross...@devitron.com wrote:
>
> The problem is that the clients have been hacked to add some information
> within the first packet sent over. and i, unfortunately, can't change
> that. so i need to be able to read in the raw first 128 bits, get some
> info out of tha
> The problem is that the clients have been hacked to add some
> information
> within the first packet sent over. and i, unfortunately, can't change
> that. so i need to be able to read in the raw first 128 bits, get some
> info out of that, and the have the SSL connection go just as normal,
> n
> Adam Grossman wrote:
>
>> One last questions, and i am done bugging you about this...
>>
>> These are the steps i am taking:
>>
>> SSL_set_fd(ssl_data->ssl_ssl, sock_fd);
>> sslbio=SSL_get_rbio(ssl_data->ssl_ssl);
>>
>> internalBIO=BIO_new(BIO_s_bio());
>> BIO_set_write_buf_size(internalBIO, 1024
Adam Grossman wrote:
> One last questions, and i am done bugging you about this...
>
> These are the steps i am taking:
>
> SSL_set_fd(ssl_data->ssl_ssl, sock_fd);
> sslbio=SSL_get_rbio(ssl_data->ssl_ssl);
>
> internalBIO=BIO_new(BIO_s_bio());
> BIO_set_write_buf_size(internalBIO, 1024);
>
> B
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:33:47PM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
> These are the steps i am taking:
>
> SSL_set_fd(ssl_data->ssl_ssl, sock_fd);
No, you do not associate the network socket with the SSL engine,
your app copies data back and forth between the SSL engine network
bio and the socket. SS
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 11:41 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:39:13AM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 17:06 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:11:04PM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
> > >
> > > > A simpler question might be
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:39:13AM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 17:06 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:11:04PM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
> >
> > > A simpler question might be (hopefully), is after i call "SSL_accept",
> > > is there a way to re
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 17:06 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:11:04PM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
>
> > A simpler question might be (hopefully), is after i call "SSL_accept",
> > is there a way to retrieve all the raw data which was read in by
> > SSL_accept?
>
> Don't ca
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:11:04PM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
> A simpler question might be (hopefully), is after i call "SSL_accept",
> is there a way to retrieve all the raw data which was read in by
> SSL_accept?
Don't call SSL_accept() unless you know that the client's first
message is an SS
A simpler question might be (hopefully), is after i call "SSL_accept",
is there a way to retrieve all the raw data which was read in by
SSL_accept?
thanks,
-=- adam grossman
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:51 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:57:35AM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:57:35AM -0500, Adam Grossman wrote:
> Is there a way i can detect if the incoming connection is not SSL/TLS
> (not encrypted) and then retrieve what has been read in already. i will
> then use standard read/write to handle the unsecure connection? i know
> that sounds l
12 matches
Mail list logo
