We have in apps/
in x509.c
print_name(STDout, "issuer= ",
X509_get_issuer_name(x), nmflag);
in crl.c
print_name(bio_out, "issuer=", X509_CRL_get_issuer(x),
nmflag);
In order to make a fair change that will potentially hurt everyone, I
propos
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
>
> > 2009/10/30 Dr. Stephen Henson :
> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > 2) When you enable informational messages, you get accurate
> > >> > informatio
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
> 2009/10/30 Dr. Stephen Henson :
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > 2) When you enable informational messages, you get accurate informational
> >> > messages.
> >>
> >> Please tell me, why it isn't a bug! I don't
2009/10/30 Dr. Stephen Henson :
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
>
>>
>> >
>> > 2) When you enable informational messages, you get accurate informational
>> > messages.
>>
>> Please tell me, why it isn't a bug! I don't understand it. In my case
>> and also in the uncleared case of He
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
>
> >
> > 2) When you enable informational messages, you get accurate informational
> > messages.
>
> Please tell me, why it isn't a bug! I don't understand it. In my case
> and also in the uncleared case of Helga Krause, the CRL was issued by
> Pers
2009/10/29 David Schwartz :
>
> Daniel Marschall:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I am not searching bugs in my code. I have a certificate and a CRL.
>> And the functionality -issuer_checks is buggy. My cert and CRL have
>> exactky the same DN as issuer.
>
> What is the bug then? All you've reported so far is:
Daniel Marschall:
> Hello.
>
> I am not searching bugs in my code. I have a certificate and a CRL.
> And the functionality -issuer_checks is buggy. My cert and CRL have
> exactky the same DN as issuer.
What is the bug then? All you've reported so far is:
1) When you compare using exact string
Hello.
I am not searching bugs in my code. I have a certificate and a CRL.
And the functionality -issuer_checks is buggy. My cert and CRL have
exactky the same DN as issuer.
2009/10/28 David Schwartz :
> Daniel Marschall wrote:
>
>> Any idea? This problem exists since 2003 and noone found an answ
Daniel Marschall wrote:
> Any idea? This problem exists since 2003 and noone found an answer -
> this is unbelievable.
If you're waiting for somebody else to find a bug in *your* code, you're
going to be waiting a long time.
Comparing the text strings for literal equality makes no logical sense
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
> Any idea? This problem exists since 2003 and noone found an answer -
> this is unbelievable.
>
> >
> > Yes, without that flag, the certificate is valid ("OK"). I know, that
> > the issuer-name-errors are actually not really errors, but warnings.
> >
Any idea? This problem exists since 2003 and noone found an answer -
this is unbelievable.
2009/10/26 Daniel Marschall :
> 2009/10/25, Dr. Stephen Henson :
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
>>
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > I have a problem with verification of certificates.
>> >
>> > My com
2009/10/25, Dr. Stephen Henson :
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have a problem with verification of certificates.
> >
> > My command line is:
> >
> > openssl verify -verbose -issuer_checks -crl_check_all -CAfile
> > tmp_cachain.pem daniel-marschall.crt
> >
>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009, Daniel Marschall wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a problem with verification of certificates.
>
> My command line is:
>
> openssl verify -verbose -issuer_checks -crl_check_all -CAfile
> tmp_cachain.pem daniel-marschall.crt
>
Do you get an error without -issuer_checks? As the
13 matches
Mail list logo
