From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Prabhat Puroshottam
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 07:04
We have a product which uses OpenSSL to connect and transfer
application level data. There are two ways to connect, and get the
application level data from *Agent* to *Client*
1.
Ø (sorry for duplicating the thread, I did'nt receive any answer in my mailbox
as I expected, I only saw them through the mail archive...?)
It’s common (and many would say, the correct behavior) for mailing list replies
to go to the mailing list.
Ø I've started with a 1K key and later on
Aside: this message was pretty garbled, and in richtext which my Outlook won't
fix sensibly.
I've tried to manually reformat what I can, but it would be easier if you
posted plaintext.
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of laurent.boll...@laposte.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 08,
Are you sure that the key exchange is not a factor? Have you measured SSL
setup times compared to post-setup transfer times?
4K RSA is computationally expensive. Are you sure that the rest of your system
is secure enough to justify that instead of 2K RSA?
/r$
--
Principal
RSA key size only affects handshake, and should be costly client side only if
using client-auth; are you?
Data handling speed will normally be affected by encryption *and* MAC (usually
HMAC).
You could certainly try different data (symmetric) cipher, such as 3DES or RC4.
I don’t know
try typing
openssl s_time ?
raj H wrote:
*[safeTgram (optim1) receive status: NOT encrypted, NOT signed.]*
Thanks Jimmy! This command looks to help me for the performance! Only
thing is I have to get it working. I keep on getting errors.
Anyways, thanks! I will go through and get it
Hi raj,
Try openssl speed
Best regards,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:48 AM, raj H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jimmy! This command looks to help me for the performance! Only
thing is I have to get it working. I keep on getting errors.
Anyways, thanks! I will go through and get it running.
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/03/2008 04:18:42 AM:
Anybody any comments?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:56 PM, raj H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Experts,
OpenSSL 9.8b. We are facing some performance issues with it. I
heard that
doing session reuse or using some other
Thanks Marek for your comments!
When you say, session reuse improves the handshake performance, what factor?
If normal handshake takes 1 second, how long it will take to negotiate
session re-use?
What about the other issues such as memory leaks and security concerns with
session re-use?
Does
raj H wrote:
Thanks Marek for your comments!
[snip]
I am sorry these questions are really vague and not of challenge for the
technical personals. But I believe these are the questions any solution
developer or openssl user would have. Isn't the OpenSSL publishes any
numbers?
Have you
Thanks Jimmy! This command looks to help me for the performance! Only thing
is I have to get it working. I keep on getting errors.
Anyways, thanks! I will go through and get it running.
Any inputs on session reuse?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:39 PM, jimmy bahuleyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
raj H
Anybody any comments?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:56 PM, raj H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Experts,
OpenSSL 9.8b. We are facing some performance issues with it. I
heard that doing session reuse or using some other ciphers can help improve
the performance significantly.
I would like
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:56 PM, raj H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody any comments?
It's really hard to help you because your question is so vague. What
platform are you using? What performance are you seeing? What performance
did you expect? Is the problem with session setup rate or
On Monday 09 July 2001 13:52, Steven A. Bade wrote:
OK Stupid question Where can one find SWAMP???
There's a downloadable tarball at;
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/crypto/
However, expect a heavily revamped version soon ...
Cheers,
Geoff
Ah, big difference. It is running much, much faster, and now runs pretty
much even with the apache/mod_ssl server. Thanks Geoff.
Chris
On Monday 09 July 2001 11:17 am, you wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, C. Gould wrote:
I've created some server code based on openssl 0.9.6 that seems to be
15 matches
Mail list logo
