> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
> Of Jakob Bohm
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 21:43
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [AES-GCM] TLS packet nounce_explicit overflow
>
> I seem to recall (I haven't
On 10/03/2017 04:34, Michael Wojcik wrote:
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Jakob Bohm
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 19:05
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [AES-GCM] TLS packet nounce_explicit overflow
First, note my original
> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
> Of Jakob Bohm
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 19:05
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [AES-GCM] TLS packet nounce_explicit overflow
First, note my original calculatio
*Sent:* Thursday, March 09, 2017 05:49
*To:* openssl-users@openssl.org
*Subject:* Re: [openssl-users] [AES-GCM] TLS packet nounce_explicit
overflow
No, it does not do this automatically.
*if the nounce _explicit overflows or overlaps , then does openssl
code handles it (atleast by initiating
-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] [AES-GCM] TLS packet nounce_explicit overflow
No, it does not do this automatically.
if the nounce _explicit overflows or overlaps , then does openssl code
handles it (atleast by initiating renegotiation )?
--
openssl-users mailing list
No, it does not do this automatically.
if the nounce _explicit overflows or overlaps , then does openssl code
handles it (atleast by initiating renegotiation )?
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
