Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] dates, times, durations in next release (commands)

2016-09-07 Thread Salz, Rich
> Support RFC3339[1] is relative easy. But it's not enough, as folks are asking for the ability to specify durations. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] dates, times, durations in next release (commands)

2016-09-06 Thread Dongsheng Song
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > > It's not a huge step to support full blown ISO 8601 (which has a few more > > alternatives to specify time intervals *). I like the idea. > > No, it *is* a huge step. There's a reason why W3C XML schema language > (XSD),

Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] dates, times, durations in next release (commands)

2016-09-06 Thread Salz, Rich
> Sorry, I was unclear. What I meant was that it's not a huge step from the XSD > to full blown ISO 8601. No, sorry, *I* was unclear. I think it is a huge step to go full-blown. E.g., all the missing fields and the 'w' duration. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] dates, times, durations in next release (commands)

2016-09-06 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <3a1728b8c014426bb3e557832d275...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:14:38 +, "Salz, Rich" said: rsalz> rsalz> > It's not a huge step to support full blown ISO 8601 (which has a few more rsalz> > alternatives to specify time intervals

Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] dates, times, durations in next release (commands)

2016-09-06 Thread Salz, Rich
> It's not a huge step to support full blown ISO 8601 (which has a few more > alternatives to specify time intervals *). I like the idea. No, it *is* a huge step. There's a reason why W3C XML schema language (XSD), not known for being lightweight, profiled the ISO standard. -- openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] [openssl-dev] dates, times, durations in next release (commands)

2016-09-06 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <490f88be6dcf4d5c9baa3f3b5e4c4...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:11:01 +, "Salz, Rich" said: rsalz> I am thinking of standardizing the syntax for dates, times, and rsalz> durations used by the applications in the next releases, based